Microsoft Corporation v. Lam et al

Filing 14

STIPULATION for Protective Order by parties. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Protective Order)(Bateman, David)

Download PDF
Microsoft Corporation v. Lam et al Doc. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER - 1 No. C09-0815 RSM K:\2000103\03194\20332_DAB\20332P24DW The Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE MICROSOFT CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff, No. C09-0815 RSM STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER ERIC LAM A/K/A ERIC CHUEN LAM, MELANIE SUEN A/K/A MELANIE MA LAN SUEN A/K/A MA LAN MELANIE SUEN A/K/A/ MA LAN SUEN, GORDON LAM, SUPER CONTINENTAL US LLC, SUPER CONTINENTAL USA LLC, UMGE, and DOES 1 THROUGH 50, inclusive, Defendants. Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft") and Eric Lam, Melanie Suen, Gordon Lam, Super Continental US LLC, Super Continental USA LLC and UMG (collectively, the "Lam Defendants"), respectfully move for, and stipulate to, entry of the attached Protective Order Regarding Handling of Trade Secrets and Confidential Material. STIPULATED AND REQUESTED this 10th day of November, 2009. K&L GATES LLP By /s/ David A. Bateman David A. Bateman, WSBA #14262 Attorneys for Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation 925 Fourth Ave., Suite 2900 Seattle, Washington 98104 Tele: (206) 623-7580 Fax: (206) 370-6013 Email: david.bateman@klgates.com NEWMAN & NEWMAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP By /s/ Derek Linke Derek Linke, WSBA #38314 Attorneys for Defendants Eric Lam, Melanie Suen, Gordon Lam, Super Continental US LLC, Super Continental USA LLC, and UMGE 505 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 610 Seattle, Washington 98104 Tele: (206) 274-2800 Fax: (206) 274-2801 Email: linke@newmanlaw.com K&L GATES LLP 925 FOURTH AVENUE SUITE 2900 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104-1158 TELEPHONE: (206) 623-7580 FACSIMILE: (206) 623-7022 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?