Suzlon Energy LTD v. Microsoft Corp
Filing
14
ORDER: Because Petitioners surreply (Dkt. No. 13) does not conform to the requirements of Local Rule 7(g), the Court STRIKES the submission. The Court shall not consider Petitioners surreply while reaching a decision on Respondents motion to quash, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (RK)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 MICROSOFT CORP., Respondent. v.
The Honorable Marsha J. Pechman
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE SUZLON ENERGY LTD., Case No. C10-0170 MJP Petitioner, ORDER STRIKING SURREPLY
On February 22, 2010, Petitioner Suzlon Energy Ltd. ("Suzlon") filed a "limited surreply" in opposition to Microsoft's motion to quash. (Dkt. No. 13.) Under Local Rule 7 subsections (b) and (g), a surreply may only be filed when a party seeks to strike material filed contained in or attached to a reply brief. Even in that limited circumstance, a party must first file a notice of intent to file a surreply. See CR 7(g)(1). Because Petitioner's surreply does not conform to the requirements of Local Rule 7(g), the Court STRIKES the submission. The Court shall not consider Petitioner's surreply while reaching a decision on Respondent's motion to quash. The Clerk shall transmit a copy of this Order to all counsel of record. Dated this 22nd day of February, 2010.
Marsha J. Pechman United States District Judge
A
CASE NO. C10-0170 MJP
ORDER STRIKING SURREPLY - 1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
