Jones v. Glebe

Filing 18

ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Respondent's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 9 ) is GRANTED. Petitioner's federal habeas petition (Dkt. No. 4 ) is DISMISSED, with prejudice, under 28 U.S.C.§ ; 2244(d). In accordance with Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, a certificate of appealability is DENIED with respect to all claims asserted by petitioner in his federal habeas petition. (cc: pltf)(CL)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER DISMISSING FEDERAL HABEAS PETITION (3) JIMMIE L. JONES, JR., ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) PAT GLEBE, ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE CASE NO. C10-340-RAJ ORDER DISMISSING FEDERAL HABEAS PETITION The Court, having reviewed petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus, respondent's motion to dismiss the petition, the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge, the petitioner's objections, and the balance of the record, does hereby find and Order: (1) (2) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Respondent's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 9) is GRANTED. Petitioner's federal habeas petition (Dkt. No. 4) is DISMISSED, with prejudice, under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). In accordance with Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, a certificate of appealability is DENIED with respect to all 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 (4) claims asserted by petitioner in his federal habeas petition. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner, to counsel for respondent, and to Judge Donohue. DATED this 5th day of October, 2010. A The Honorable Richard A. Jones United States District Judge ORDER DISMISSING FEDERAL HABEAS PETITION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?