Amazon.com LLC v. Lay

Filing 20

STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time to File Answer re 19 Stipulation filed by Kenneth R Lay; Answer or other responsive pleading is due 7/12/10 by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (TF)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME - 1 10-cv-00664-MJP THE HONORABLE MARSHA J. PECHMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE AMAZON.COM, LLC, No. 10-cv-00664-MJP Plaintiff, v. KENNETH R. LAY, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Revenue, Defendant. STIPULATION The parties stipulate and agree as follows: 1. Defendant, Kenneth R. Lay, accepted service of process in this case and the time STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE ANSWER NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: JUNE 16, 2010 to file an answer or other responsive pleading to plaintiff's Complaint is June 21, 2010. 2. As a result of counsels' other litigation commitments and responsibilities as well as difficulties in coordinating work schedules of persons with relevant information, the defendant is still in the process of investigating, researching, and preparing the answer or other responsive pleading. 3. The intricacies of proceeding in conjunction with local counsel and conforming to the local requirements of the District Court for the Western District of Washington also require additional time. N.C. Department of Justice Post Office Box 629 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 (919) 716-6900 Fax (919) 716-6763 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. Defendant has not previously requested an extension of time to file an answer or other responsive pleading in this matter. 5. Defendant's counsel have conferred with plaintiff's counsel who have agreed to stipulate to the requested extension. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court's approval, that the time for filing an answer or other responsive pleading should be extended to July 12, 2010. DATED this 16th day of June, 2010. McKAY CHADWELL, PLLC By: /s/ Thomas M. Brennan Thomas M. Brennan, WSBA No. 30662 600 University St., Suite 1601 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 233-2800 Facsimile: (206) 233-2809 Email: tmb@mckay-chadwell.com Pro Hac Vice: ATTORNEY GENERAL ROY COOPER By: /s/ Kay Linn Miller Hobart Kay Linn Miller Hobart Special Deputy Attorney General N.C. State Bar No. 16746 khobart@ncdoj.gov Telephone: (919) 716-6550 Fax: (919) 715-3550 By: /s/ Tiare B. Smiley Tiare B. Smiley Special Deputy Attorney General N.C. State Bar No. 7719 tsmiley@ncdoj.gov Telephone: (919) 716-6900 Facsimile: (919) 716-6763 N.C. Department of Justice P.O. Box 629 Raleigh, NC 27602 Attorneys for Defendant STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME - 2 10-cv-00664-MJP DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP By: /s/ Steven P. Caplow___________ Steven P. Caplow, WSBA No. 19843 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101-3045 Telephone: (206) 622-3150 Facsimile: (206) 757-7700 Email: stevencaplow@dwt.com Of Counsel Pro Hac Vice: DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP Laura R. Handman Robert G. Scott, Jr. Elizabeth J. Soja 1919 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 200 Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 973-4224 Facsimile: (202) 973-4499 Email: laurahandman@dwt.com bobscott@dwt.com elizabethsoja@dwt.com Attorneys for Plaintiff N.C. Department of Justice Post Office Box 629 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 (919) 716-6900 Fax (919) 716-6763 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER Based on the foregoing stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, therefore it is so ordered that the time for defendant to file an answer or other responsive pleading is hereby extended to July 12, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of June, 2010. A Marsha J. Pechman United States District Judge STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME - 3 10-cv-00664-MJP N.C. Department of Justice Post Office Box 629 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 (919) 716-6900 Fax (919) 716-6763

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?