Putz et al v. Golden et al
Filing
158
ORDER granting 146 Panonia's Motion to Withdraw as Attorney; granting 151 Golden's Motion seeking authorization for their counsel to file a satisfaction of judgment in this matter ; granting 155 Dr. Putz's Motion for release of funds ; granting 156 Dr. Putz's Motion for release of funds, by Judge James L. Robart.(MD, cc to Fin'l Dept; mailed copy of order to Dr. Putz)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
HERBERT R. PUTZ, et al.,
CASE NO. C10-0741JLR
Plaintiffs,
11
ORDER
v.
12
13
MICHAEL H. GOLDEN, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
I.
INTRODUCTION
Before the court are Plaintiff Herbert R. Putz’s motions to release the remaining
funds from the court registry that Defendants Michael H. Golden and Suzanne C. Golden
(“the Goldens”) have deposited in this proceeding (Dkt. ## 155, 156), the Goldens’
motion for entry of satisfaction of judgment (Dkt. # 151), and counsel’s motion to
withdraw as attorney for Plaintiff Panonia Realty Company (“Panonia”) (Dkt. # 146).
The court has considered each motion, all submissions filed in support thereof, the
22
ORDER- 1
1 balance of the record, and the applicable law. Being fully advised, the court GRANTS all
2 of the foregoing motions.
3
4
II.
BACKGROUND
On October 26, 2012, the court finalized its judgment in favor of Plaintiffs.
5 (Judgment (Dkt. # 135).) On the same day, the court also issued an order granting the
6 Goldens’ request to deposit $150,000.00, plus accrued statutory interest, in the court’s
7 registry in satisfaction of the court’s judgment pending the outcome of Plaintiffs’ appeal.
8 (10/26/ Order (Dkt. # 134).) On October 29, 2012, the Goldens deposited $150,000.00,
9 plus $197.28 of accrued interest, for a total of $150,197.28. (10/29/12 Letter (Dkt. #
10 136).) On November 8, 2012, Dr. Putz filed a motion to withdraw his appeal (see
11 11/8/12 Mot. (Dkt. # 137) at 5), and the Ninth Circuit granted the motion on November
12 14, 2012 (Mandate (Dkt. # 138)).
13
With his appeal withdrawn, Dr. Putz moved for release of the funds from the
14 court’s registry. (See generally 11/8/12 Mot.) Shortly thereafter, Dr. Putz’s former law
15 firm, Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgardner & Preece, LLP (“Corr Cronin”), filed a notice
16 of attorney’s lien on some of the funds in the court registry. (Not. of Lien (Dkt. # 139).)
17 In addition, the court awarded Plaintiffs an additional $2,542.80 in costs. (Order on Bill
18 of Costs (Dkt. # 142).)
19
On December 12, 2012, the court directed the clerk to retain $83,116.09 in the
20 registry, which was an amount equal to the attorney’s lien filed by Corr Cronin.
21 (12/12/12 Order (Dkt. # 148) at 6.) The court, however, also authorized the clerk to draw
22 a check on the funds in the remaining amount of $67,081.19, plus all accrued interest,
ORDER- 2
1 minus any statutory user fess, payable to Dr. Putz. (Id. (citing Local Rules, W.D. Wash.,
2 CR 67(b).) The court granted the Goldens’ request to deposit into the court registry an
3 additional $2,542.80, which was the amount of costs that the court awarded to Plaintiffs.
4 (Id. (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 67(a)).)
5
On December 12, 2012, Plaintiffs and Corr Cronin entered into a stipulation
6 whereby the parties agreed that the court could release $17,750.00 from the court registry
7 to Corr Cronin in full satisfaction of Corr Cronin’s attorney lien. (Stip. (Dkt. # 150).) On
8 December 20, 2012, the court entered the parties’ stipulation as an order and directed the
9 clerk to release $17,750.00 to Corr Cronin. (Stip. & Order (Dkt. # 153).)
10
On December 14, 2012, the Goldens deposited with the court registry $2,542,80 in
11 costs awarded to Plaintiffs, plus $12.54 in accrued interest, for a total of $2,555.34.
12 (12/14/12 Letter (Dkt. # 149).) On December 20, 2012, the Goldens’ filed their present
13 motion seeking permission to enter a satisfaction of judgment on their own behalf.
14 (12/20/12 Mot. (Dkt. # 151).) Plaintiffs have not filed a response to the Golden’s motion.
15 (See Goldens’ Resp. (Dkt. # 157).)
16
On December 21, 2012, Dr. Putz moved for the release of $2,542.80 from the
17 court registry, which was an amount equal to the costs awarded to him by the court.
18 (12/21/12 Mot. (Dkt. # 155).) On December 28, 2012, Dr. Putz moved for the release of
19
20
21
22
ORDER- 3
1 all remaining funds in the court registry with respect to this case. 1 (12/28/12 Mot. (Dkt.
2 # 156).) The Goldens did not file an opposition to either of Dr. Putz’s motions.
3
In addition to the foregoing motions, Corr Cronin filed a motion seeking to
4 withdraw from the representation of Panonia. (Mot. to Withdraw (Dkt. # 146).) As with
5 the other motions at issue here, no party has filed an opposition to Corr Cronin’s motion
6 to withdraw.
7
8
III.
ANALYSIS
Dr. Putz moves for the release of all remaining funds that are presently in the
9 court’s registry with respect to this litigation. (See 12/21/12 Mot.; 12/28/12 Mot. ) The
10 funds in the registry have been deposited by the Goldens in satisfaction of the court’s
11 judgment and award of costs in this matter. No party has filed an opposition to Dr. Putz’s
12 motions. The court may consider the lack of any opposition “as an admission that the
13 motion has merit.” Local Rules W.D. Wash. CR 7(a)(2). The court sees no reason to
14 delay release of the funds. Therefore, in accord with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
15 67(b) and Local Rule 67(a), the court grants Dr. Putz’s motions for release of all
16 remaining funds that were deposited into the court registry by the Goldens with respect to
17 this litigation, along with any accrued interest. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 67(b); Local Rules
18 W.D. Wash. CR 67(a).
19
20
1
Dr. Putz asked for the release of $2,542.80 in his first motion and $65,366.09 in his
second motion for a total of $67,908.89. (12/21/12 Mot. at 1; 12/28/12 Mot. at 1.) However, the
21
actual figure should be $67,921.43. Dr. Putz’s calculations apparently neglected to include the
$12.54 of interest that the Goldens deposited on December 12, 2012. (See 12/14/12 Letter at
22 1-2.)
ORDER- 4
1
In recognition of the completion of their obligations with respect to all court
2 orders in this litigation, the Goldens’ have sought permission to enter a satisfaction of
3 judgment on their own behalf. Ordinarily, Plaintiffs would file a satisfaction of judgment
4 upon receipt of the funds herein. In light of the acrimonious nature of the relationship
5 between the parties here, and in light of Dr. Putz’s pro se status, the court agrees that
6 authorizing counsel for the Goldens’ to file the satisfaction of judgment makes sense
7 here. In addition, Plaintiffs have not filed an opposition to the Goldens’ motion. As
8 noted above, pursuant to the court’s local rules, the court may consider this to be an
9 admission that the motion has merit. See Local Rules W.D. Wash. CR 7(a)(2).
10 Accordingly, the court grants the Goldens’ motions and authorizes their counsel to file a
11 satisfaction of judgment in the form attached as Exhibit 1 to counsel’s declaration. (See
12 12/20/12 Hall Decl. (Dkt. # 152) Ex. 1 (attaching form of satisfaction of judgment).)
13
Finally, the court has reviewed Corr Cronin’s motion to withdraw from
14 representation of Panonia (see Dkt. # 146) and finds it to be in compliance with
15 requirements of the local rules of this court. See Local Rules W.D. Wash. CR 83.2(b).
16 Accordingly, the court exercises its discretion to permit Corr Cronin to withdraw from
17 representation of Panonia and grants the motion.
18
19
IV.
CONCLUSION
Based on the foregoing, the court GRANTS Dr. Putz’s motions for release of the
20 remaining funds from the court’s registry pertaining to this case (Dkt. ## 155, 156).
21 Pursuant to this order, the court AUTHORIZES and DIRECTS the clerk to draw a check
22 on the funds the Goldens deposited in the court’s registry in the principal amount of
ORDER- 5
1 $67,921.43, plus all accrued interest, minus any statutory user fees, payable to Dr.
2 Herbert R. Putz. The court further DIRECTS the clerk to mail or otherwise deliver the
3 check to Dr. Putz. See Local Rules W.D. Wash. CR 67(b).
4
The court further GRANTS the Golden’s motion seeking authorization for their
5 counsel to file a satisfaction of judgment in this matter in the form described above (Dkt.
6 # 151). Finally, the court GRANTS Corr Cronin’s motion to withdraw from
7 representation of Panonia (Dkt. # 146).
8
Dated this 24th day of January, 2013.
9
11
A
12
JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge
10
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER- 6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?