Gutierrez v. Cort et al

Filing 42

ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. The Court ORDERS plaintiff to file proof of service of the summons and complaint no later than July 21, 2011. The Court DEFERS ruling on Precision's motion to dismiss, docket no. 34 , and RENOTES the 39 motion mediation on July 22, 2011. (CL) (cc: pltf)

Download PDF
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 MICHAEL GUTIERREZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) DAVID CORT, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________ ) CASE NO. C10-1072Z ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the motion to dismiss, docket no. 24, filed by defendant Precision Engines, LLC (“Precision”). Precision moves to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint, docket no. 24, for insufficiency of service of process under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(5), and 19 for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Plaintiff submitted a certificate of 20 service of process indicating that he served the summons and complaint on “Precision Air” via the 21 22 United Parcel Service. Cert. of Serv. at 3, 8, docket no. 29. Plaintiff has not served the summons ORDER - 1 01 and complaint on the correct entity. Moreover, plaintiff has failed to follow the proper procedure 02 for effecting service by mail. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1) (authorizing service of process in any 03 manner provided by state law); Wash. Sup. Ct. Civ. R. 4(d)(4) (permitting service by mail in 04 05 limited circumstances that would otherwise justify service by publication under RCW 4.28.100-.110, provided the plaintiff complies with certain requirements and obtains Court 06 approval). 07 Generally, a plaintiff must serve the defendant with copies of the summons and complaint 08 09 10 within 120 days after filing the complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). For a defendant added as a party by an amended complaint, the 120-day deadline commences after filing of the amended complaint. 11 See McGuckin v. United States, 918 F.2d 811, 813 (9th Cir. 1990) (holding that the 120-day 1 12 deadline for serving the summons and complaint found in Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) restarts as to a 13 defendant first added as a party by an amended complaint). Here, plaintiff filed his amended 14 complaint on January 21, 2011. Am. Compl., docket no. 24. As such, under Rule 4(m), plaintiff 15 has until May 21, 2011 to properly serve Precision with the summons and complaint. However, in 16 light of plaintiff’s pro se status, and the leniency generally afforded to pro se litigants, the Court 17 18 GRANTS plaintiff an additional sixty days, until July 20, 2011, to serve Precision with signed and completed copies of the summons and amended complaint, consistent with the requirements of Fed. 19 R. Civ. P. 4. 20 21 22 1 McGuckin was decided under a prior version of the rule, when the 120-day deadline was originally found in subsection j. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(j) (1990). ORDER - 2 01 The Court ORDERS plaintiff to file proof of service of the summons and complaint no later 02 than July 21, 2011. The Court advises plaintiff that if he fails to timely serve Precision with the 03 summons and amended complaint, consistent with the requirements of Rule 4, or fails to file timely 04 05 proof of such service, the Court will grant Precision’s motion, and dismiss plaintiff’s remaining claims. 06 Pending plaintiff’s compliance with the Court’s Order to effect service, the Court DEFERS 07 ruling on Precision’s motion to dismiss, docket no. 34, and RENOTES the motion for consideration 08 09 10 11 on July 22, 2011. The parties shall file no further briefing or evidence in connection with the deferred motion unless requested by the Court. The Court further RENOTES plaintiff’s motion for mediation, docket no. 39, for 12 consideration on July 22, 2011. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Minute Order to all 13 counsel of record and to plaintiff pro se. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 DATED this 10th day of May, 2011. 16 17 A 18 Thomas S. Zilly United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 ORDER - 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?