Gutierrez v. Cort et al
Filing
42
ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. The Court ORDERS plaintiff to file proof of service of the summons and complaint no later than July 21, 2011. The Court DEFERS ruling on Precision's motion to dismiss, docket no. 34 , and RENOTES the 39 motion mediation on July 22, 2011. (CL) (cc: pltf)
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
MICHAEL GUTIERREZ,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
DAVID CORT, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_________________________________ )
CASE NO. C10-1072Z
ORDER
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the motion to dismiss, docket no. 24, filed by
defendant Precision Engines, LLC (“Precision”). Precision moves to dismiss plaintiff’s amended
complaint, docket no. 24, for insufficiency of service of process under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(5), and
19
for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Plaintiff submitted a certificate of
20
service of process indicating that he served the summons and complaint on “Precision Air” via the
21
22
United Parcel Service. Cert. of Serv. at 3, 8, docket no. 29. Plaintiff has not served the summons
ORDER - 1
01 and complaint on the correct entity. Moreover, plaintiff has failed to follow the proper procedure
02 for effecting service by mail. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1) (authorizing service of process in any
03 manner provided by state law); Wash. Sup. Ct. Civ. R. 4(d)(4) (permitting service by mail in
04
05
limited circumstances that would otherwise justify service by publication under RCW
4.28.100-.110, provided the plaintiff complies with certain requirements and obtains Court
06
approval).
07
Generally, a plaintiff must serve the defendant with copies of the summons and complaint
08
09
10
within 120 days after filing the complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). For a defendant added as a party
by an amended complaint, the 120-day deadline commences after filing of the amended complaint.
11 See McGuckin v. United States, 918 F.2d 811, 813 (9th Cir. 1990) (holding that the 120-day
1
12 deadline for serving the summons and complaint found in Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) restarts as to a
13 defendant first added as a party by an amended complaint). Here, plaintiff filed his amended
14 complaint on January 21, 2011. Am. Compl., docket no. 24. As such, under Rule 4(m), plaintiff
15 has until May 21, 2011 to properly serve Precision with the summons and complaint. However, in
16 light of plaintiff’s pro se status, and the leniency generally afforded to pro se litigants, the Court
17
18
GRANTS plaintiff an additional sixty days, until July 20, 2011, to serve Precision with signed and
completed copies of the summons and amended complaint, consistent with the requirements of Fed.
19
R. Civ. P. 4.
20
21
22
1
McGuckin was decided under a prior version of the rule, when the 120-day deadline was originally found in subsection j. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(j) (1990).
ORDER - 2
01
The Court ORDERS plaintiff to file proof of service of the summons and complaint no later
02 than July 21, 2011. The Court advises plaintiff that if he fails to timely serve Precision with the
03 summons and amended complaint, consistent with the requirements of Rule 4, or fails to file timely
04
05
proof of such service, the Court will grant Precision’s motion, and dismiss plaintiff’s remaining
claims.
06
Pending plaintiff’s compliance with the Court’s Order to effect service, the Court DEFERS
07
ruling on Precision’s motion to dismiss, docket no. 34, and RENOTES the motion for consideration
08
09
10
11
on July 22, 2011. The parties shall file no further briefing or evidence in connection with the
deferred motion unless requested by the Court.
The Court further RENOTES plaintiff’s motion for mediation, docket no. 39, for
12 consideration on July 22, 2011. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Minute Order to all
13 counsel of record and to plaintiff pro se.
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
DATED this 10th day of May, 2011.
16
17
A
18
Thomas S. Zilly
United States District Judge
19
20
21
22
ORDER - 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?