Lemons v. Verity Credit Union

Filing 5

ORDER re 4 Complaint filed by John Lemons: declining to serve complaint and granting leave to amend; signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (SC) TF mailed copies of Order, General Order, and Blank Complaint form to pltf/ Text Modified on 7/22/2010 (TF).

Download PDF
Lemons v. Verity Credit Union Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 JOHN LEMONS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) VERITY CREDIT UNION, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) CASE NO. C10-1104MJP ORDER DECLINING TO SERVE COMPLAINT AND GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND Plaintiff has filed a civil complaint with this court. The Court, having reviewed the complaint and record, does hereby find and ORDER that the complaint is defective for the following reasons: (1) Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that A pleading which sets forth a claim for relief . . . shall contain (1) a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends, unless the court already has jurisdiction to support it, (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and (3) a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. . . . Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Plaintiff's complaint does not comply with the requirements set forth in Rule 8(a). If plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, he must specifically identify the basis for this Court's jurisdiction. Although it is clear enough that Plaintiff believes he has been defrauded by Defendant Verity Credit Union, it is not clear on what basis he believes that this Court has jurisdiction to hear his claim. He ORDER DECLINING TO SERVE AND GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND - 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 identifies no federal statute or federal constitutional claim which would allow this Court to consider his request for relief. (2) Plaintiff may file an amended complaint curing the above-mentioned deficiencies within thirty days of the date on which this Order is signed. The amended complaint must be legible and must be sufficiently clear to produce a readable scanned image. In addition, the amended complaint must carry the same case number as this one. If no amended complaint is timely filed, the Court will recommend that this matter be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Plaintiff is advised that an amended pleading operates as a complete substitute for an original pleading. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir.) (citing Hal Roach Studios, Inc. v. Richard Feiner & Co., Inc., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990) (as amended), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 915 (1992). Thus, if plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, the Court will not consider his original complaint. (3) The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff the appropriate forms so that he may file an amended complaint. The Clerk is further directed to send copies of this Order, and of the General Order, to plaintiff. DATED this 22nd day of July, 2010. A Marsha J. Pechman U.S. District Judge ORDER DECLINING TO SERVE AND GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?