McDonald v. OneWest Bank, FSB et al

Filing 137

ORDER granting pltf's 105 Motion for Reconsideration by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(RS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 10 11 12 _______________________________________ ) JAMES MCDONALD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) ONEWEST BANK, FSB, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________________) No. C10-1952RSL ORDER GRANTING RECONSIDERATION 13 14 This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s timely “Motion for 15 Reconsideration [of] Order Denying FCRA Claim in Amended Complaint.” Dkt. # 105. On 16 February 21, 2012, the Court granted in part plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint, but 17 found that the proposed Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) claim would be futile because 18 plaintiff had failed to allege that he disputed the foreclosure with a credit reporting agency 19 and/or that the credit reporting agency provided notice of the dispute to OneWest. 20 Plaintiff acknowledges that his proposed allegations regarding the FCRA claim 21 were deficient, but states that he did, in fact, notify the three credit reporting agencies of his 22 dispute with OneWest and that, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1681i(a)(2)(A), the credit reporting 23 agencies were required to provide notice of the dispute to OneWest within five business days. 24 Plaintiff may, within seven days of the date of this order, file a second amended complaint that 25 includes the necessary allegations to support his FCRA claim. 26 ORDER GRANTING RECONSIDERATION 1 2 3 4 5 In light of this newly-added claim, the parties shall confer to determine whether a further extension of the remaining case management deadlines is appropriate. If the parties are in agreement regarding the need for an extension, a stipulation setting forth a new discovery deadline or trial date may be submitted to the Court for consideration. Dated this 19th day of April, 2012. 6 A 7 Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER GRANTING RECONSIDERATION -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?