M.R. et al v. Dreyfus et al

Filing 73

MINUTE ORDER DENYING IN PART AND DEFERRING IN PART pltfs' 11 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction ; Court denies the motion for TRO and will issue a separate order explaining its reasons as soon as possible; Court defers the motion for prelim inj pending oral argument set for 1/14/11; pltf's motion for prelim inj is renoted to 1/14/11; dfts' responses to motion for prelim inj and pltfs' motion for class certif are due 1/7/11; pltfs' replies due 1/11/11 by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (RS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE M.R., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SUSAN DREYFUS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C10-2052Z MINUTE ORDER The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: (1) Plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction, docket no. 11, is DENIED in part and DEFERRED in part as follows: (a) The Court DENIES the motion for a temporary restraining order and will issue a separate Order explaining its reasons for denying plaintiffs' motion as soon as possible; (b) The Court DEFERS the motion for a preliminary injunction pending oral argument scheduled for January 14, 2011. (2) Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, docket no. 11, is RENOTED to January 14, 2011. Defendants' responses to plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction 20 and plaintiffs' motion for class certification are due on January 7, 2011, and plaintiffs' replies are due on January 11, 2011. 21 22 23 24 25 26 MINUTE ORDER - 1 (3) record. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of Filed and entered this 30th day of December, 2010. WILLIAM M. McCOOL, Clerk By s/ Claudia Hawney Claudia Hawney Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?