Jonassen v. Port of Seattle

Filing 80

ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. The court ORDERS the parties to SHOW CAUSE no later than February 21, 2014, why the court should not decline supplemental jurisdiction of plaintiff's only remaining State law claim for breach of contract. 42 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(1) & (3). (CL)

1

HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES

2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

8
9
10

TRACY JONASSEN,

11

Plaintiff,
v.

12
13

CASE NO. C11-34 RAJ
ORDER

PORT OF SEATTLE,

14

Defendant.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

This matter comes before the court sua sponte. The Ninth Circuit affirmed this
court’s dismissal of plaintiff’s claim for violation of the False Claims Act, but reversed
with respect to his breach of contract claim. Dkt. ## 78-79. The court ORDERS the
parties to SHOW CAUSE why the court should not decline supplemental jurisdiction of
plaintiff’s only remaining State law claim for breach of contract. 42 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(1)
& (3). The parties shall meet and confer and file joint briefing pursuant to Local Civil
Rule 37. The joint filing shall be due no later than February 21, 2014.
Dated this 21st day of January, 2014.

A

24
25

The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Judge

26
27

ORDER- 1