Stith v. United States of America

Filing 16

ORDER granting petitioner's 15 Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner is directed to file and serve his response not later than July 25, 2011, and petitioner's underlying Sec. 2255 petition is RENOTED for 07/29/11. A COPY OF THIS ORDER HAS BEEN MAILED TO PETITIONER TODAY. Signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler.(GB)

Download PDF
01 02 03 04 05 06 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 07 08 STACY EARL STITH, 09 10 11 12 13 ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________ ) CASE NO. C11-0359-JLR-MAT ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME The Court, having considered petitioner’s second motion for an extension of time to file 14 15 a response to the government’s answer to petitioner’s § 2255 motion, and the balance of the 16 record, does hereby find and ORDER: 17 (1) Petitioner’s second motion for an extension of time to file a response (Dkt. No. 18 15) is GRANTED. Petitioner indicates in his motion that he requires a brief period of 19 additional time to file his response because he has been unable to make necessary copies of his 20 materials at his institution. Petitioner’s request appears reasonable. Petitioner is directed to 21 file and serve his response not later than July 25, 2011. 22 / / / ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME PAGE - 1 01 (2) Petitioner’s § 2255 motion (Dkt. No. 1) is RE-NOTED on the Court’s calendar 02 for consideration on July 29, 2011. The government must file any reply brief by that date. 03 (3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner, to the United 04 States Attorney, and to the Honorable James L. Robart. 05 DATED this 15th day of July, 2011. 06 A 07 Mary Alice Theiler United States Magistrate Judge 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME PAGE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?