The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, et al v. Killinger et al
Filing
89
RESPONSE, by Plaintiff The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, to 87 MOTION to Dismiss [Defendants Motion for a Reasonableness Determination and Entry of Final Judgment of Dismissal Pursuant to Settlement] MOTION to Dismiss [Defendants Motion for a Reasonableness Determination and Entry of Final Judgment of Dismissal Pursuant to Settlement]. (Barton, Walter)
The Honorable Marsha J. Pechman
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
9
10
11
12
13
THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION, as RECEIVER of
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK,
14
Plaintiff,
15
v.
16
17
18
KERRY KILLINGER, STEPHEN J.
ROTELLA, DAVID SCHNEIDER, LINDA
KILLINGER and ESTHER ROTELLA,
19
Case No. 2:11-cv-00459-MJP
PLAINTIFF FDIC’S JOINDER IN
SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR A REASONABLENESS
DETERMINATION AND ENTRY OF
FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
PURSUANT TO SETTLEMENT
Note on Motion Calendar:
February 24, 2012
Defendants.
20
21
22
Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of Washington Mutual
23
Bank (“FDIC”), hereby joins Defendants’ Motion for a Reasonableness Determination and
24
Entry of Final Judgment of Dismissal Pursuant to Settlement (Docket No. 87).
25
26
27
28
PLAINTIFF FDIC’S JOINDER IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR REASONABLENESS
DETERMINATION AND ENTRY OF FINAL
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL - 1
No. 2:11-cv-00459-MJP
#836779 v1 / 44469-001
Law Offices
KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL
A Professional Service Corporation
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2900, Seattle, Washington 98101-3028
Telephone (206) 223-1313, Facsimile (206) 682-7100
1
Dated: February 24, 2012.
2
Respectfully submitted,
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION, as Receiver for
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK,
Plaintiff
3
4
5
s/ Walter E. Barton
One of Its Attorneys
6
7
Barry S. Rosen (admitted pro hac vice)
Duane F. Sigelko (admitted pro hac vice)
Mark S. Hersh (admitted pro hac vice)
Henry Pietrkowski (admitted pro hac vice)
James A. Rolfes (admitted pro hac vice)
REED SMITH LLP
10 South Wacker Drive
Suite 4000
Chicago, IL 60606
(312) 207-1000
8
9
10
11
12
13
Bruce E. Larson, WSBA #6209
Walter E. Barton, WSBA #26408
Dennis H. Walters, WSBA #9444
KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2900
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: (206) 223-1313
gbarton@karrtuttle.com
14
15
16
17
18
19
Leonard J. DePasquale (admitted pro hac vice)
Counsel
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
3501 North Fairfax Drive, VS-B-7058
Arlington, VA 22226
(703) 562-2063
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLAINTIFF FDIC’S JOINDER IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR REASONABLENESS
DETERMINATION AND ENTRY OF FINAL
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL - 2
No. 2:11-cv-00459-MJP
#836779 v1 / 44469-001
Law Offices
KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL
A Professional Service Corporation
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2900, Seattle, Washington 98101-3028
Telephone (206) 223-1313, Facsimile (206) 682-7100
1
2
3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on February 24, 2012, the foregoing was electronically filed with the
Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to all
4
5
6
counsel of record who receive CM/ECF notification, and that the remaining parties shall be
served in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
7
8
s/ Walter E. Barton
WSBA #26408
KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL
Of Attorneys for Plaintiff
1201 Third Avenue, Ste. 2900
Seattle WA 98101
Telephone: (206) 223-1313
Fax: (206) 682-7100
E-mail: gbarton@karrtuttle.com
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLAINTIFF FDIC’S JOINDER IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR REASONABLENESS
DETERMINATION AND ENTRY OF FINAL
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL - 3
No. 2:11-cv-00459-MJP
#836779 v1 / 44469-001
Law Offices
KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL
A Professional Service Corporation
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2900, Seattle, Washington 98101-3028
Telephone (206) 223-1313, Facsimile (206) 682-7100
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?