Norgal Seattle Partnership, et al v. National Surety Corporation, et al
Filing
55
ORDER Denying Defts' 41 Motion for Dismissal or Sanctions by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(TF)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
NORGAL SEATTLE PARTNERSHIP,
8
Plaintiff,
Case No. C11-0720RSL
9
10
11
v.
NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION,
et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
This matter comes before the Court on “Defendant’s Motion for Dismissal
or Sanctions for Plaintiff’s Failure to Comply with Pretrial Procedures.” Dkt. # 41.
Under the original case management schedule issued by the Court on June 22, 2011, and
Local Civil Rule 16(h), plaintiff’s pretrial statement was to be served on defendant no
later than February 21, 2012. Dkt. # 13. Plaintiff did not, however, serve its statement.
On March 1, 2012, defendant moved for dismissal of the above-captioned matter as a
sanction for failing to comply with the case management order.1
20
21
22
23
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
SANCTIONS
On March 7, 2012, the Court struck the trial date and all remaining
deadlines, including the deadline for submitting the pretrial order, pending its ruling on
two outstanding motions for summary judgment. The summary judgment motions are
scheduled for oral argument on April 18th, and the case management order will be reset
24
25
26
1
Defendant also moved for sanctions for a presumed violation of the March 5, 2012,
mediation deadline. A request for sanctions for a violation that had not yet occurred is
premature.
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS - 1
1
after the motions are resolved. Although plaintiff’s failure to timely serve its pretrial
2
statement is troubling, there is no indication that defendant made any effort to confer
3
with plaintiff regarding this scheduling dispute, and defendant has not been prejudiced
4
by the failure. The Court therefore declines to impose sanctions.
5
6
7
For all of the foregoing reasons, defendant’s motion for dismissal or
sanction (Dkt. # 41) is DENIED.
8
Dated this 4th day of April, 2012.
9
10
11
A
Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?