Kumar et al v. Entezar et al

Filing 97

ORDER granting 95 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney C James Frush withdrawn for Entezar dfts and cross claimants by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(RS) Modified on 1/7/2013/cc Baydovskiy (RS).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
_______________________________________
)
DAVID KUMAR, et al.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
v.
)
)
WADE M. ENTEZAR, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________)

No. C11-1082RSL
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
WITHDRAW

14

This matter comes before the Court on the unopposed “Motion to Withdraw as
15

Counsel of Record for Defendants Wade M. Entezar, Geneva K. Entezar and Entezar
16

Development Group, Inc.” Dkt. # 95. Counsel has complied with Local Civil Rule 83.2(b)(1)
17

and (3). The Court therefore GRANTS C. James Frush and Cable Langenbach Kinerk & Bauer,
18

LLP’s motion to withdraw as counsel for defendants and cross-claimants Wade M. Entezar,
19

Geneva K. Entezar and Entezar Development Group, Inc.
20

“Corporations and other unincorporated associations must appear in court through
21

an attorney.” Licht v. Am. W. Airlines, 40 F.3d 1058, 1059 (9th Cir. 1994). Defendant Entezar
22

Development Group, Inc., shall retain new counsel within twenty-one days from the date of this
23

Order. Failure to associate new counsel may result in the entry of default against Entezar
24

Development Group, Inc., and dismissal of its cross-claims.
25
26

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW

1
2

Dated this 7th day of January, 2013.

3
4

A
Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW

-2-