Mayo et al v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
Filing
102
ORDER (1) The parties shall engage in mediation by April 1, 2013. (2) Plaintiffs motions to appoint counsel (Dkt. ## 78, 87) are stricken as MOOT. (3) Plaintiffs motion to reschedule Rule 26(f) conference (Dkt. # 86) is GRANTED. The conference shal l be conducted within thirty (30) days of this Order.(4) Plaintiffs motion to amend (Dkt. # 82), motion to delete (Dkt. # 98), and motion to update civil cover sheet (Dkt. # 100) are GRANTED.(5) Plaintiffs motion to appoint outside medical expert (Dkt. # 88) is DENIED.(6) Plaintiffs motion for the Court to order production of documents (Dkt. # 96) and Defendants motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 83) are STAYED until mediation is completed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)cc Mayo
1
2
Hon. Ricardo S. Martinez
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
11
12
13
ELEONOR A. MAYO, personal
representative of the Estate of Richard V.
Mayo, Sr.,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
vs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
NO. 2:11-1115-RSM
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS
AND DIRECTING
PARTICIPATION IN
MEDIATION
Defendant.
17
18
I. MEDIATION
19
20
21
Local Civil Rule 39.1 permits the Court to order the parties to engage in
mediation in any civil case. LCR 39.1(c). The Court finds that mediation will assist the
22
parties and the Court with the expeditious resolution of Mrs. Mayo’s claims.
23
Accordingly, the parties shall engage in mediation by April 1, 2013. All pending motions
24
not addressed below are hereby stayed until completion of mediation. The Court directs
25
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS AND DIRECTING
PARTICIPATION IN MEDIATION
the parties to LCR 39.1(c) for information regarding appointing a pro bono mediator.
1
2
Within two weeks following mediation, the parties shall submit a joint status report to the
3
Court. If the parties have failed to reach a resolution of the case at that time, the Court
4
will rule on the remaining motions.
II. PLAINTIFF’S PENDING MOTIONS
5
6
A. Motions to Appoint Counsel
7
8
9
The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s motion for counsel and directed
appointment of pro bono counsel. Dkt. # 58. Despite the Court’s order, pro bono counsel
could not be secured to represent Plaintiff before the Court. The Court has since
10
exhausted all avenues available to it to secure counsel. Plaintiff must continue to
11
represent herself in this case. Plaintiff states that the pro bono panel referred counsel to
12
13
14
assist with settlement negotiations (Dkt. # 86, p. 3), and it is the Court’s hope that such
counsel will assist Plaintiff with mediation as directed above. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s
15
additional motions to appoint counsel are duplicative and stricken as MOOT. Dkt. ## 78,
16
87.
17
B. Motion to Amend Complaint, Motion for Leave of Court to Delete, and
Motion to Amend JS 44 Civil Cover Sheet
18
19
20
Plaintiff asks the Court for leave to remove all references to claims alleging
intentional torts against Defendants in her pleadings and responsive documents and to
21
amend her Third Amended Complaint. Plaintiff wishes to proceed only upon claims of
22
unintentional negligence and medical malpractice against Defendant. The Court treats
23
Plaintiff’s request as a motion to dismiss her intentional torts claims. Plaintiff may move
24
25
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS AND DIRECTING
PARTICIPATION IN MEDIATION
to dismiss claims she has alleged if it becomes apparent that such claims have no basis in
1
2
3
law or fact.
Defendant contends that amendment of the complaint would be futile as it has
4
moved for summary judgment on each of Plaintiff’s allegations. Dkt. # 85. Because the
5
Court directs the parties to participate in mediation prior to consideration of Defendant’s
6
motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff will be permitted to amend her complaint a final
7
time. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motions are Granted. Dkt. ## 82, 98, 100.
8
9
10
C. Motion for Extension of Time to Conduct Rule 26(f) Conference
Plaintiff asks the Court to reschedule the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference. For
good cause shown, Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to participate in the Rule
11
26(f) conference is Granted. Dkt. # 86. The Court will issue an amended scheduling
12
order and the Rule 26(f) conference shall be conducted within thirty (30) days of the date
13
14
15
16
of this Order.
D. Motion for Appointment of Outside Medical Expert
Plaintiff asks the Court to appoint an outside medical expert to challenge the
17
expert opinions offered by Dr. John M. Luce in support of Defendant’s motion for
18
summary judgment. Plaintiff makes this request on the basis that she cannot afford to
19
20
secure an expert on her own behalf. Dkt. # 88, p. 2. Plaintiff does not, however, direct
the Court to any authority permitting court appointment of a medical expert to assist her.
21
District courts have no authority to appoint expert witnesses to assist plaintiffs
22
proceeding under the in forma pauperis statute. Pedraza v. Jones, 71 F.3d 194, 196 (5th
23
Cir. 1995). Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion shall be Denied.
24
25
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS AND DIRECTING
PARTICIPATION IN MEDIATION
III. CONCLUSION
1
2
3
Having reviewed the motions, responses and replies thereto, the attached exhibits
and affidavits, and the remainder of the record, the Court hereby finds and ORDERS:
4
(1) The parties shall engage in mediation by April 1, 2013.
5
(2) Plaintiff’s motions to appoint counsel (Dkt. ## 78, 87) are stricken as MOOT.
6
(3) Plaintiff’s motion to reschedule Rule 26(f) conference (Dkt. # 86) is GRANTED.
7
8
The conference shall be conducted within thirty (30) days of this Order.
(4) Plaintiff’s motion to amend (Dkt. # 82), motion to delete (Dkt. # 98), and motion
9
to update civil cover sheet (Dkt. # 100) are GRANTED.
10
(5) Plaintiff’s motion to appoint outside medical expert (Dkt. # 88) is DENIED.
11
(6) Plaintiff’s motion for the Court to order production of documents (Dkt. # 96) and
12
13
14
15
16
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 83) are STAYED until
mediation is completed.
(7) The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward a copy of this Order to Plaintiff at
her most recent address and to all counsel of record.
17
18
DATED this 16 day of January, 2013.
19
20
21
A
22
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
23
24
25
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS AND DIRECTING
PARTICIPATION IN MEDIATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?