Valdez-Sanchez v. Asher
Filing
22
ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. The court GRANTS Petitioner's 21 motion for an extension of time to respond to the R&R. The court adopts the supplemental 20 Report and Recommendation, DISMISSES this action, and directs the clerk to enter judgment for Respondent. (CL) (cc: petitioner)
1
HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
JULIO CESAR VALDEZ-SANCHEZ,
11
Petitioner,
12
CASE NO. C11-1483RAJ
ORDER
v.
13
NATHALIE ASHER,
14
Respondent.
15
The court has reviewed the Supplemental Report and Recommendation (“R&R”)
16
17 (Dkt. # 20) of the Honorable Mary Alice Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge and has
18 considered Petitioner’s motion (Dkt. # 21) for an extension of time to respond to the
19 R&R.
20
The court previously referred this matter to Judge Theiler for a supplemental
21 recommendation on whether the bond hearing Plaintiff had recently received satisfied
22 Respondent’s due process obligations. The R&R concluded that the bond hearing was
23 legally sufficient. The court reaches the same conclusion.
24
Petitioner filed an unopposed motion for an extension of time asking for an
25 additional two weeks beyond April 13, 2012, to object to the R&R. The court GRANTS
26 that motion, but notes that Petitioner did not file an objection to the R&R by April 27,
27 2012, the new deadline that he requested. Given the conclusions of the R&R, it is highly
ORDER- 1
1 unlikely that Petitioner’s objection, even if he had timely filed it, would have led the
2 court to a different result.
3
The court adopts the supplemental R&R, DISMISSES this action, and directs the
4 clerk to enter judgment for Respondent.
5
Dated this 1st day of May, 2012.
6
A
7
8
The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Court Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
ORDER- 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?