Oh v. Pacific International Bank et al

Filing 11

ORDER granting 9 Motion to re-note motion to dismiss; 7 MOTION to Dismiss re-noted to 10/14/2011; signed by Docket Clerk M Duett at the direction of Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(SC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 JOSEPH OH, Plaintiff, 11 MINUTE ORDER v. 12 13 CASE NO. C11-1509 MJP PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL BANK, Defendant. 14 15 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Marsha J. 16 17 Pechman, United States District Judge: The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s “Ex Parte Request Court to Strike Defendants’ Motion 18 19 to Dismiss” (Dkt. No. 9). The motion correctly observes that Defendants’ dispositive motion to 20 dismiss (Dkt. No. 7) was not noted for the fourth Friday after its filing date. The Court will not 21 dismiss the motion on that ground, but will sua sponte re-note the motion to its correct noting 22 date. 23 IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss is re-noted to October 14, 2011 24 (the fourth Friday after the filing date of September 22, 2011). Any opposition papers shall be MINUTE ORDER- 1 1 filed and served not later than the Monday before the noting date. If service is by mail, the 2 opposition papers shall be mailed not later than the Friday preceding the noting date. Any reply 3 papers shall be filed and served no later than the noting date. 4 5 The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel. 6 Filed this _28th_ day of September, 2011. 7 William M. McCool Clerk of Court 8 9 s/Mary Duett Deputy Clerk 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 MINUTE ORDER- 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?