Oh v. Pacific International Bank et al
Filing
11
ORDER granting 9 Motion to re-note motion to dismiss; 7 MOTION to Dismiss re-noted to 10/14/2011; signed by Docket Clerk M Duett at the direction of Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(SC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
JOSEPH OH,
Plaintiff,
11
MINUTE ORDER
v.
12
13
CASE NO. C11-1509 MJP
PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL BANK,
Defendant.
14
15
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Marsha J.
16
17 Pechman, United States District Judge:
The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s “Ex Parte Request Court to Strike Defendants’ Motion
18
19 to Dismiss” (Dkt. No. 9). The motion correctly observes that Defendants’ dispositive motion to
20 dismiss (Dkt. No. 7) was not noted for the fourth Friday after its filing date. The Court will not
21 dismiss the motion on that ground, but will sua sponte re-note the motion to its correct noting
22 date.
23
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss is re-noted to October 14, 2011
24 (the fourth Friday after the filing date of September 22, 2011). Any opposition papers shall be
MINUTE ORDER- 1
1 filed and served not later than the Monday before the noting date. If service is by mail, the
2 opposition papers shall be mailed not later than the Friday preceding the noting date. Any reply
3 papers shall be filed and served no later than the noting date.
4
5
The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel.
6
Filed this _28th_ day of September, 2011.
7
William M. McCool
Clerk of Court
8
9
s/Mary Duett
Deputy Clerk
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
MINUTE ORDER- 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?