Lee et al v. Abdel-Haq et al

Filing 92

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' #85 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(TF)

THE HONORABLE ROBERT S. LASNIK

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
ROBERT E. LEE, an individual, and R.E.
)
LEE INTERNATIONAL, LLC, a Washington )
limited liability company,
)
)
Plaintiffs, )
)
v.
)
)
MOHAMMAD F. A. ABDEL-HAQ, an
)
individual; FORTUNE NEST
)
CORPORATION, a Cayman Islands
)
corporation; FORTUNE NEST
)
CORPORATION, an inactive Nevada
)
corporation; and FORTUNE NEST, LTD., a )
British Virgin Islands limited company,
)
)
Defendants. )

No. C11-2021RSL
ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
ANSWER

18
19

On February 19, 2013, defendants Mohammad Abdel-Haq, Fortune Nest, Ltd., and

20

Fortune Nest Corporation filed a Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer (Dkt. #85).

21

Specifically, defendants request a 21-day extension of time, until March 25, 2013, in which to

22

respond to plaintiffs’ complaint. Plaintiffs did not oppose the motion and subsequently filed a

23

motion for leave to file a second amended complaint (Dkt. #87).

24

The Court finds that an extension of time to respond is appropriate. Defendants shall

25

have fourteen days after service of the amended pleading or denial of the motion to amend in

26

which to make a response.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER 1

1
2

Dated this 7th day of March, 2013.

3

A

4

Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER 2