Thomas v. Miller-Stout

Filing 104

MINUTE ORDER granting in part Petitioner's 103 Motion for Leave to File Over-length Objection to Report and Recommendation. Petitioner shall be allowed to file Objections in the same length as the R&R. Accordingly, those Objections shall be no longer than 38-pages in length. The Court will not entertain any further requests for overlength Objections. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Demicko Thomas, Prisoner ID: 991403) (TH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 5 6 7 DEMICKO BILLIE THOMAS, 8 Petitioner, 9 10 11 v. MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT 12 Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. C11-2186RSM MINUTE ORDER GRANTING IN PART REQUEST FOR OVERLENGTH OBJECTIONS 13 14 15 16 17 The following MINUTE ORDER is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez, Chief United States District Judge: On July 11, 2017, the Honorable Brian A. Tsuchida issued a Report and Recommendation in this matter. Dkt. #93. The R&R is 38 pages in length. Petitioner subsequently moved to file 18 overlength Objections. Dkt. #101. The Court granted his request in part, allowing him to file a 19 20 21 22 23 20-page Objections. Dkt. #102. Petitioner has now moved again for permission to file an overlength Objections, asserting that he requires 65 pages. Dkt. #103. The Court has reviewed the motion and its supporting Declaration and hereby ORDERS that Petitioner’s motion (Dkt. #102) is GRANTED IN PART. Petitioner shall be allowed to file 24 Objections in the same length as the R&R. Accordingly, those Objections shall be no longer 25 26 than 38-pages in length. The Court will not entertain any further requests for overlength 27 Objections. 28 MINUTE ORDER PAGE - 1 1 DATED this 19th day of October, 2017. 2 WILLIAM McCOOL, Clerk 3 By: 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MINUTE ORDER PAGE - 2 /s/ Paula McNabb Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?