Thomas v. Miller-Stout
Filing
104
MINUTE ORDER granting in part Petitioner's 103 Motion for Leave to File Over-length Objection to Report and Recommendation. Petitioner shall be allowed to file Objections in the same length as the R&R. Accordingly, those Objections shall be no longer than 38-pages in length. The Court will not entertain any further requests for overlength Objections. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Demicko Thomas, Prisoner ID: 991403) (TH)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
5
6
7
DEMICKO BILLIE THOMAS,
8
Petitioner,
9
10
11
v.
MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT
12
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. C11-2186RSM
MINUTE ORDER GRANTING IN PART
REQUEST FOR OVERLENGTH
OBJECTIONS
13
14
15
16
17
The following MINUTE ORDER is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable
Ricardo S. Martinez, Chief United States District Judge:
On July 11, 2017, the Honorable Brian A. Tsuchida issued a Report and Recommendation
in this matter. Dkt. #93. The R&R is 38 pages in length. Petitioner subsequently moved to file
18
overlength Objections. Dkt. #101. The Court granted his request in part, allowing him to file a
19
20
21
22
23
20-page Objections. Dkt. #102. Petitioner has now moved again for permission to file an
overlength Objections, asserting that he requires 65 pages. Dkt. #103.
The Court has reviewed the motion and its supporting Declaration and hereby ORDERS
that Petitioner’s motion (Dkt. #102) is GRANTED IN PART. Petitioner shall be allowed to file
24
Objections in the same length as the R&R. Accordingly, those Objections shall be no longer
25
26
than 38-pages in length. The Court will not entertain any further requests for overlength
27
Objections.
28
MINUTE ORDER
PAGE - 1
1
DATED this 19th day of October, 2017.
2
WILLIAM McCOOL, Clerk
3
By:
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MINUTE ORDER
PAGE - 2
/s/ Paula McNabb
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?