VSIM Patent Co LLC v. Benson et al
Filing
42
ORDER Denying as Moot Defts' 38 Motion for Order of Appearance by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (TF)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
VSIM PATENT CO, LLC,
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Case No. C12-102RSL
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
ORDER OF APPEARANCE
KEITH BENSON, et al.,
Defendants.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ “Motion for Order Requiring
Judgment Debtor to Appear for Examination Under Oath” (Dkt. # 38). In it, Defendants
ask the Court to order Plaintiff to appear to explain its failure to comply with this
Court’s Order (Dkt. # 35) that it pay Defendants’ fees on or before July 20, 2012. On
15
August 22, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause for its alleged failure. Dkt. # 40.
16
17
18
The following day, Plaintiff informed the Court that it had initiated the payment process
on August 21 and that the full amount was paid on August 22. Dkt. # 41.
In reliance on Plaintiff’s representations, the Court thus DENIES Defendants’
19
motion (Dkt. # 38) as moot. It still awaits Plaintiff’s explanation as to why it should not
20
be sanctioned for its wilful disregard of this Court’s Order (Dkt. # 35) to pay those fees
21
by July 20. Dkt. # 40.
22
23
DATED this 27th day of August, 2012.
24
A
Robert S. Lasnik
25
United States District Judge
26
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ORDER OF APPEARANCE - 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?