Myers v. Obama, et al
Filing
51
ORDER granting pltf's 50 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(RS)cc Myers
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
MICHAEL R. MYERS,
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. C12-179 MJP
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO DISMISS WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
BARACK H. OBAMA, President of the
United States, and BOEING COMPANY,
14
Defendants.
15
16
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss without prejudice.
17
(Dkt. No. 50.)
18
Under Rule 41(a)(1), a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action
19
prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Fed. R. Civ.
20
P. 41(a)(1); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995). Even if the
21
defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, a plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing
22
a notice of dismissal. Id. Here, Plaintiff Michael Myers (“Myers”) has filed a motion for
23
summary judgment, but Defendants have only filed motions to dismiss. Therefore, Myers has a
24
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS
WITHOUT PREJUDICE- 1
1 right to voluntarily dismiss his action without prejudice. Even though the Court finds it difficult
2 to understand Myers’s reasons for dismissal and despite the valid issues raised by Defendants’
3 briefing, Myers’s right to dismiss is absolute. As such, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to
4 dismiss without prejudice. Defendants’ pending motions to dismiss (Dkt. No., 34 and 35) and all
5 other pending motions are therefore moot.
6
The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel.
7
Dated this 30th day of July, 2012.
A
8
9
Marsha J. Pechman
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS
WITHOUT PREJUDICE- 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?