Myers v. Obama, et al

Filing 51

ORDER granting pltf's 50 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(RS)cc Myers

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 MICHAEL R. MYERS, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. C12-179 MJP ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE BARACK H. OBAMA, President of the United States, and BOEING COMPANY, 14 Defendants. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss without prejudice. 17 (Dkt. No. 50.) 18 Under Rule 41(a)(1), a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action 19 prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Fed. R. Civ. 20 P. 41(a)(1); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995). Even if the 21 defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, a plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing 22 a notice of dismissal. Id. Here, Plaintiff Michael Myers (“Myers”) has filed a motion for 23 summary judgment, but Defendants have only filed motions to dismiss. Therefore, Myers has a 24 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE- 1 1 right to voluntarily dismiss his action without prejudice. Even though the Court finds it difficult 2 to understand Myers’s reasons for dismissal and despite the valid issues raised by Defendants’ 3 briefing, Myers’s right to dismiss is absolute. As such, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to 4 dismiss without prejudice. Defendants’ pending motions to dismiss (Dkt. No., 34 and 35) and all 5 other pending motions are therefore moot. 6 The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel. 7 Dated this 30th day of July, 2012. A 8 9 Marsha J. Pechman United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE- 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?