Seip v. King County et al

Filing 18

DISMISSAL ORDER by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (RS)cc Seip

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

8
9
10

LARRY SEIP,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13

CASE NO. C12-388-RSM
DISMISSAL ORDER

v.
KING COUNTY et al.,
Defendants.

14
15
16

On September 4, 2012, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend his complaint to show

17 that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action. Plaintiff timely filed a motion on
18 October 10, 2012, construed by the Court as a motion to continue the deadline to amend. Dkt. #
19 16. On October 16, 2012, the Court entered a minute order granting the continuance, and
20 directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within fourteen days of the Order. Dkt. # 17.
21 Plaintiff has not yet filed an amended complaint. In both the September 4 and October 16
22 Orders, the Court stated that failure to adhere to the time restraints imposed by the Court would
23 result in dismissal of Plaintiff’s case. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s case is hereby dismissed with
24
DISMISSAL ORDER - 1

1 prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to comply with the Court’s orders.
2 The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff.
3

DATED this 4th day of January 2013.

4
5

A

6

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
DISMISSAL ORDER - 2