Grundstein v. Washington State Bar Association et al
Filing
51
ORDER by Judge Robert S. Lasnik; The Court directs Plaintiff to file a notice with the Court as to whether he still wishes his pending motions to be considered. (TF)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
5
6
7
ROBERT GRUNDSTEIN,
No. C12-569RSL
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
ORDER
vs.
WASHINGTON STATE BAR
ASSOCIATION, et al.,
11
Defendants.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On May 29, 2012, the Court
imposed $300 in sanctions on the Plaintiff and ordered him to “certify to the Court that
he has read the Local General and Civil Rules.” Dkt. # 47. On June 1, Plaintiff filed the
requested certification. Dkt. # 48. And the Court has now been informed that Plaintiff
has paid his sanctions. Accordingly, Plaintiff may now resume filing.
The Court also notes that Plaintiff has two pending motions. Because
circumstances appear to have changed while they were pending, see Dkt. # 49 (noting
that the state court proceedings have since concluded), the Court directs Plaintiff to file a
notice with the Court as to whether he still wishes those motions to be considered. If so,
the Court will re-note them.
DATED this 3rd day of July, 2012.
A
24
Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
25
26
ORDER - 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?