Irving v. Union Security Insurance Company
Filing
14
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (TF)
1
THE HONORABLE ROBERT S. LASNIK
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
9
10
11
LAURA NICOLE IRVING,
NO. 2:12-cv-00584-RSL
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
15
16
17
18
UNION SECURITY INSURANCE
COMPANY, ASSURANT EMPLOYEE
BENEFITS, a brand name for UNION
SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY,
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
COMPANY, Administrators of the Long Term
Disability Policy for the Everett Police Officer
Association,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER
Defendants.
19
20
21
This matter came before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Amend
22
Answer. The Court has considered the following:
23
1.
Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Amend Answer;
24
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
ANSWER (Case No. 2:12-cv-00584- RSL) – 1
Law Offices of
Hackett, Beecher & Hart
1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200
Seattle, Washington 98101
(206) 624-2200
1
2.
Declaration of David A. LeMaster and attached exhibits;
2
3.
Plaintiff’s Response, if any; and
3
4.
Defendant’s Reply, if any.
4
Having considered the above, the Court finds that leave to amend should be granted
5
under CR 15(a) and ORDERS that Defendant is granted leave to serve and file an amended
6
answer in the form attached as Exhibit A to Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Amend Answer.
7
Dated this 5th day of December, 2012.
8
A
9
THE HONORABLE ROBERT S. LASNIK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Presented by:
s/ David A. LeMaster
David A. LeMaster
WSBA 22874
Hackett, Beecher & Hart
1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200
Seattle, WA 98101
Tel (206) 624-2200
Fax (206) 624-1767
dlemaster@hackettbeecher.com
Counsel for Defendant
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
ANSWER (Case No. 2:12-cv-00584- RSL) – 2
Law Offices of
Hackett, Beecher & Hart
1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200
Seattle, Washington 98101
(206) 624-2200
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?