Irving v. Union Security Insurance Company

Filing 14

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (TF)

Download PDF
1 THE HONORABLE ROBERT S. LASNIK 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 11 LAURA NICOLE IRVING, NO. 2:12-cv-00584-RSL Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 15 16 17 18 UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS, a brand name for UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY, Administrators of the Long Term Disability Policy for the Everett Police Officer Association, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER Defendants. 19 20 21 This matter came before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Amend 22 Answer. The Court has considered the following: 23 1. Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Amend Answer; 24 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER (Case No. 2:12-cv-00584- RSL) – 1 Law Offices of Hackett, Beecher & Hart 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 624-2200 1 2. Declaration of David A. LeMaster and attached exhibits; 2 3. Plaintiff’s Response, if any; and 3 4. Defendant’s Reply, if any. 4 Having considered the above, the Court finds that leave to amend should be granted 5 under CR 15(a) and ORDERS that Defendant is granted leave to serve and file an amended 6 answer in the form attached as Exhibit A to Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Amend Answer. 7 Dated this 5th day of December, 2012. 8 A 9 THE HONORABLE ROBERT S. LASNIK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Presented by: s/ David A. LeMaster David A. LeMaster WSBA 22874 Hackett, Beecher & Hart 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101 Tel (206) 624-2200 Fax (206) 624-1767 dlemaster@hackettbeecher.com Counsel for Defendant 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER (Case No. 2:12-cv-00584- RSL) – 2 Law Offices of Hackett, Beecher & Hart 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 624-2200

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?