Espino v. Astrue
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; court reverses and remands matter by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (RS)
01
02
03
04
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
05
06
07 DOCINA RENE ESPINO,
08
09
10
11
12
13
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
)
Commissioner of Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
____________________________________ )
CASE NO. C12-0967-RSL-MAT
ORDER OF REMAND
The parties agree that this matter should be reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence
14 six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings. (Dkts. 11 and 12.) It is
15 therefore ORDERED:
16
(1)
The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;
17
(2)
The Court REVERSES and REMANDS this matter for further administrative
proceeding pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g);
18
19
(3)
On remand, the Commissioner and Appeals Council will expedite the case and
20
have sixty (60) days to continue to search for the missing recording and to file
21
an answer in this Court upon location of those records. If the recording cannot
22
be located, the Appeals Council, within that same sixty-day period, will remand
ORDER OF REMAND
PAGE -1
01
the case for a de novo hearing to be held within 120 days of the date of the
02
Appeals Council’s remand order;
(4)
03
The Court will retain jurisdiction over the action pending further administrative
04
proceedings. If the outcome of a de novo hearing is unfavorable to plaintiff,
05
defendant will move to reinstate the case so that plaintiff need not file a new
06
complaint in order to obtain judicial review; and
07
(5)
The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to all counsel and to Judge Theiler.
08
DATED this 23rd day of January, 2013.
09
10
11
A
Robert S. Lasnik
12
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER OF REMAND
PAGE -2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?