Townsel v. Gahan et al

Filing 43

ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. The court ADOPTS the R&R (Dkt. # 39 ), grants Mr. Townsel's request for voluntary dismissal, and directs the court to DISMISS this action without prejudice. (CL) (cc: pltf)

Download PDF
HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 JERRY UVARIUS TOWNSEL, Plaintiff, 10 11 12 CASE NO. C12-1165RAJ v. ORDER TOMAS GAHAN, et al., Defendants. 13 14 This matter comes before the court on a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) 15 from the Honorable Brian A. Tsuchida, United States Magistrate Judge. Dkt. # 39. For 16 the reasons stated herein, the court ADOPTS the R&R, thereby granting Plaintiff’s 17 request for voluntary dismissal. The court directs the clerk to dismiss this action without 18 prejudice. 19 Plaintiff Jerry Townsel, who is incarcerated and appearing pro se, filed this suit 20 alleging that prosecutors in the King County Prosecutor’s office violated his rights in 21 obtaining and releasing his medical records from the King County Jail. He also sued one 22 Jail employee. 23 Defendants answered the complaint and filed a summary judgment motion in 24 which they contended that collateral estoppel, prosecutorial immunity, qualified 25 immunity, and the doctrine expressed in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) 26 mandated judgment as a matter of law on all of his claims. Plaintiff responded to the 27 28 ORDER – 1 1 summary judgment motion. Judge Tsuchida stayed discovery pending his decision on the 2 motion. 3 On December 4, Mr. Townsel asked the court to voluntarily dismiss his case 4 without prejudice. He asked to dismiss the case “in the interest of justice and economy of 5 judicial resources.” Dkt. # 36. 6 Defendants responded by demanding that Mr. Townsel (who is proceeding in 7 forma pauperis in this case) either pay more than $2,000 in attorney fees or agree to 8 dismissal of his case with prejudice. 9 10 In the R&R, Judge Tsuchida recommends that the court reject Defendants’ request for attorney fees and grant the voluntary dismissal without prejudice. 11 Mr. Townsel received Defendants’ demand for attorney fees before he received 12 the R&R. He filed a motion for extension of time to respond to the demand and asked 13 the court to appoint counsel. He asks that the court consider appointment of counsel 14 before his request for voluntary dismissal, but does not retract his request for voluntary 15 dismissal. 16 Mr. Townsel has no right to court-appointed counsel in this civil case, and the 17 court declines to exercise its discretion to appoint counsel. For at least the reasons stated 18 in Defendants’ summary judgment motion, it does not appear to the court that Mr. 19 Townsel has a viable claim. 20 In a case where a defendant has filed an answer or a motion for summary 21 judgment and does not consent to voluntary dismissal, the court can condition the 22 dismissal on “terms that the court considers proper.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Here, 23 Defendants’ request for attorney fees or a dismissal with prejudice are not proper terms. 24 The court recognizes the time that Defendants’ counsel invested in defending against Mr. 25 Townsel’s claims. If the court grants Mr. Townsel’s request for dismissal without 26 prejudice, one of two things will happen. Mr. Townsel might choose not to bring his 27 28 ORDER – 2 1 claim again, in which case the outcome will be no different than if Defendants had 2 prevailed on their summary judgment motion. If, on the other hand, Mr. Townsel refiles 3 his suit, nothing will prevent Defendants from relying on the same summary judgment 4 motion they filed in this case. In either event, Defendants have suffered no prejudice. 5 The court accordingly ADOPTS the R&R (Dkt. # 39), grants Mr. Townsel’s 6 request for voluntary dismissal, and directs the court to DISMISS this action without 7 prejudice. The clerk shall give notice of this order to Judge Tsuchida. 8 DATED this 3rd day of January, 2013. 9 A 10 11 12 The Honorable Richard A. Jones United States District Court Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER – 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?