United States of America v. City of Seattle
Filing
448
ORDER APPROVING THE PARTIES' AND THE MONITOR'S AGREED PHASE II SUSTAINMENT PERIOD PLAN signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
13
CITY OF SEATTLE,
ORDER APPROVING THE
PARTIES’ AND THE
MONITOR’S AGREED PHASE II
SUSTAINMENT PERIOD PLAN
Defendant.
14
15
CASE NO. C12-1282JLR
On January 10, 2018, the court ordered Plaintiff United States of America (“the
16
Government”), Defendant City of Seattle (“the City”), and the Monitor to “meet, confer,
17
and prepare a plan for discharging their obligations under the Consent Decree during the
18
Phase II sustainment period.” (1/10/18 Order (Dkt. # 439) at 14, see id. at 16; see also
19
Consent Decree (Dkt. # 3-1, as amended at Dkt. # 13).) Before the court is Defendant
20
City of Seattle’s (“the City”) memorandum outlining the parties’ agreed plan for
21
proceeding under the Phase II sustainment period (“the Sustainment Period Plan” or “the
22
Plan”). (City Mem. (Dkt. # 444).) The City asks the court to issue an order approving
ORDER - 1
1
the Plan. (Id. at 16.) The Government and the Monitor filed separate memoranda
2
supporting the Plan. (US Mem. (Dkt. # 446); Monitor Mem. (Dkt. # 445).) The court
3
has carefully reviewed the Sustainment Period Plan (see City Mem.) and the matrix of
4
deadlines attached as exhibit A to the Plan (Matrix (Dkt. # 444-1)). Being fully advised,
5
the court APPROVES the Sustainment Period Plan and the attached matrix of deadlines
6
as the governing documents for the parties’ and the Monitor’s conduct of Phase II of the
7
Consent Decree.
8
Dated this 13th day of March, 2018.
9
10
A
11
JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?