United States of America v. City of Seattle
Filing
640
ORDER granting Defendant's 638 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time. The deadline for the memoranda required by the Courts July 22nd Order (Dkt. # 626 ) is continued to September 12. DOJ's motion for a preliminary injunction is due September 17, the City's response is due September 29, and DOJ's reply is due October 2. The Temporary Restraining Order regarding the effective date of the Crowd Control Weapons Ordinance is extended by three weeks so that it expires on October 9, 2020. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (LH)
Case 2:12-cv-01282-JLR Document 640 Filed 08/19/20 Page 1 of 3
THE HONORABLE JAMES L. ROBART
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
9
Plaintiff,
10
v.
11
CITY OF SEATTLE,
12
Defendant.
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:12-cv-01282-JLR
ORDER GRANTING CITY OF
SEATTLE’S STIPULATED MOTION TO
EXTEND TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
ORDER AND RELATED BRIEFING
SCHEDULE
14
Having reviewed the City of Seattle’s Stipulated Motion to extend the temporary restraining
15
order regarding the Crowd Control Ordinance and to extend the related briefing schedule, the Court
16
GRANTS the motion and orders as follows:
17
(1) The deadline for the memoranda required by the Court’s July 22nd Order (Dkt. # 626)
18
is continued to September 12.
19
(2) DOJ’s motion for a preliminary injunction is due September 17, the City’s response is
20
due September 29, and DOJ’s reply is due October 2.
21
//
22
//
23
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CITY OF SEATTLE’S
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TERMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER AND RELATED BRIEFING - 1
(12-CV-01282-JLR)
Peter S. Holmes
Seattle City Attorney
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2050
Seattle, WA 98104
(206) 684-8200
Case 2:12-cv-01282-JLR Document 640 Filed 08/19/20 Page 2 of 3
1
2
(3) The Temporary Restraining Order regarding the effective date of the Crowd Control
Weapons Ordinance is extended by three weeks so that it expires on October 9, 2020.
3
4
DATED this 19th day of August, 2020.
A
5
6
JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Presented by:
PETER S. HOLMES
Seattle City Attorney
s/ Kerala T. Cowart
Kerala T. Cowart, WSBA #53649
Assistant City Attorney
Seattle City Attorney’s Office
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2050
Phone: (206) 733-9001
Fax: (206) 684-8284
Email: kerala.cowart@seattle.gov
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CITY OF SEATTLE’S
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TERMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER AND RELATED BRIEFING - 2
(12-CV-01282-JLR)
Peter S. Holmes
Seattle City Attorney
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2050
Seattle, WA 98104
(206) 684-8200
Case 2:12-cv-01282-JLR Document 640 Filed 08/19/20 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
3
I hereby certify that on August 17, 2020, I filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court
using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to the following:
4
Brian T. Moran
bmoran@usdoj.gov
5
Christina Fogg
Christina.Fogg@usdoj.gov
Matt Waldrop
james.waldrop@usdoj.gov
Kerry Jane Keefe
kerry.keefe@usdoj.gov
Peter Samuel Holmes
peter.holmes@seattle.gov
Jeff Murray
jeff.murray@usdoj.gov
Ronald R. Ward
Ron@wardsmithlaw.com
Timothy D. Mygatt
timothy.mygatt@usdoj.gov
Gary T. Smith
gary.smith@seattle.gov
Hillary H. McClure
hillarym@vjmlaw.com
David A. Perez
dperez@perkinscoie.com
Anna Thompson
annathompson@perkinscoie.com
Kristina M. Detwiler
kdetwiler@unionattorneysnw.com
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Merrick Bobb
mbobb@pacbell.net
14
Bruce E.H. Johnson
brucejohnson@dwt.com
15
Eric M. Stahl
ericstahl@dwt.com
16
DATED this 17th day of August, 2020, at Seattle, King County, Washington.
s/ Kerala T. Cowart
Kerala T. Cowart, WSBA #53649
Assistant City Attorney
E-mail: kerala.cowart@seattle.gov
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CITY OF SEATTLE’S
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TERMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER AND RELATED BRIEFING - 3
(12-CV-01282-JLR)
Peter S. Holmes
Seattle City Attorney
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2050
Seattle, WA 98104
(206) 684-8200
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?