United States of America v. City of Seattle

Filing 643

ORDER granting Parties' 642 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time. The deadline for the memoranda required by the Court's July 22nd Order (Dkt. 626 ) is October 3. DOJ's motion for a preliminary injunction is due October 8, th e City's response is due October 20, and DOJ's reply is due October 23. The Temporary Restraining Order regarding the effective date of the Crowd Control Weapons Ordinance is extended by three weeks so that it expires on October 30, 2020. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (LH)

Download PDF
Case 2:12-cv-01282-JLR Document 643 Filed 09/10/20 Page 1 of 3 THE HONORABLE JAMES L. ROBART 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 CITY OF SEATTLE, 12 Defendant. 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:12-cv-01282-JLR ORDER GRANTING CITY OF SEATTLE’S STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND RELATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE 14 Having reviewed the City of Seattle’s stipulated motion to extend the temporary restraining 15 order regarding the Crowd Control Ordinance and to extend the related briefing schedule, the Court 16 GRANTS the motion and orders as follows: 17 18 19 20 21 22 (1) The deadline for the memoranda required by the Court’s July 22nd Order (Dkt. 626) is October 3. (2) DOJ’s motion for a preliminary injunction is due October 8, the City’s response is due October 20, and DOJ’s reply is due October 23. (3) The Temporary Restraining Order regarding the effective date of the Crowd Control Weapons Ordinance is extended by three weeks so that it expires on October 30, 2020. 23 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CITY OF SEATTLE’S STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TERMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND RELATED BRIEFING - 1 (12-CV-01282-JLR) Peter S. Holmes Seattle City Attorney 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2050 Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 684-8200 Case 2:12-cv-01282-JLR Document 643 Filed 09/10/20 Page 2 of 3 1 DATED this 10th day of September 2020. 2 A 3 4 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Presented by: PETER S. HOLMES Seattle City Attorney s/ Kerala T. Cowart Kerala T. Cowart, WSBA #53649 Assistant City Attorney Seattle City Attorney’s Office 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2050 Phone: (206) 733-9001 Fax: (206) 684-8284 Email: kerala.cowart@seattle.gov 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CITY OF SEATTLE’S STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TERMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND RELATED BRIEFING - 2 (12-CV-01282-JLR) Peter S. Holmes Seattle City Attorney 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2050 Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 684-8200 Case 2:12-cv-01282-JLR Document 643 Filed 09/10/20 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 3 I hereby certify that on September 10, 2020, I filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to the following: 4 Brian T. Moran bmoran@usdoj.gov 5 Christina Fogg Christina.Fogg@usdoj.gov Matt Waldrop james.waldrop@usdoj.gov Kerry Jane Keefe kerry.keefe@usdoj.gov Peter Samuel Holmes peter.holmes@seattle.gov Jeff Murray jeff.murray@usdoj.gov Ronald R. Ward Ron@wardsmithlaw.com Timothy D. Mygatt timothy.mygatt@usdoj.gov Gary T. Smith gary.smith@seattle.gov Hillary H. McClure hillarym@vjmlaw.com David A. Perez dperez@perkinscoie.com Anna Thompson annathompson@perkinscoie.com Kristina M. Detwiler kdetwiler@unionattorneysnw.com 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Merrick Bobb mbobb@pacbell.net 14 Bruce E.H. Johnson brucejohnson@dwt.com 15 Eric M. Stahl ericstahl@dwt.com 16 DATED this 10th day of September, 2020, at Seattle, King County, Washington. s/ Kerala T. Cowart Kerala T. Cowart, WSBA #53649 Assistant City Attorney E-mail: kerala.cowart@seattle.gov 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CITY OF SEATTLE’S STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TERMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND RELATED BRIEFING - 3 (12-CV-01282-JLR) Peter S. Holmes Seattle City Attorney 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2050 Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 684-8200

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?