395 Lampe LLC v. Kawish LLC et al

Filing 203

ORDER granting 202 Stipulated Motion to Correct Order Dismissing Certain Claims re 201 Order by Judge Richard A Jones.(PM)

Download PDF
HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 395 LAMPE, LLC, et al. 9 Plaintiffs, Counterclaim Defendants, 10 v. 11 12 ORDER KAWISH, LLC, et al., Defendants, Counterclaim Plaintiffs, Third-Party Plaintiffs, 13 14 v. 15 16 CASE NO. C12-1503RAJ WAYNE L. PRIM, et al., Third-Party Defendants. 17 18 The Parties 1 filed a Stipulated Motion to Correct Order Dismissing Certain Claims 19 20 Without Prejudice with the Court on July 31, 2015. Dkt. # 202. Good cause appearing, 21 the Court hereby GRANTS the Parties’ Stipulated Motion. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Court’s July 22, 2015 Order (Dkt. # 201) 22 23 is modified as follows: 24 25 26 27 28 1 The Parties in this matter are Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants 395 Lampe, LLC, Prim 1988 Recovable Trust, and Edgewood Commercial Village, LLC, Third-Party Defendant Wayne L. Prim (collectively, the “Prim Entities”), Defendants Jessica Blixseth and Desert Ranch, LLLP, and Defendants, Counterclaim Plaintiffs, and Third-Party Plaintiffs Kawish, LLC and Timothy L. Blixseth. ORDER – 1 1 Only the portion of the Prim Entities’ Sixth Claim for Relief, contained in their 2 Second Amended Complaint, seeking relief upon Timothy L. Blixseth’s personal 3 guaranty of Kawish Note III is dismissed without prejudice. The remaining portion of 4 the Prim Entities’ Sixth Claim for Relief seeking relief upon Timothy L. Blixseth’s 5 personal guaranty of Kawish Note II remains a part of this action and is subject to the 6 summary judgment schedule outlined in the Order. 7 8 DATED this 14th day of August, 2015. 9 A 10 11 The Honorable Richard A. Jones United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER – 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?