Triple B Corporation v. YLM, Inc. et al

Filing 20

ORDER re 19 Response to Order to Show Cause. The Court orders that Plaintiff's claims are dismissed and this case is closed. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 TRIPLE B CORPORATION, d/b/a CHARLIE’S PRODUCE, Plaintiff, 11 12 CASE NO. C12-1665 RSM ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. 13 YLM, INC. and JASON BROWN, 14 Defendants. 15 This matter comes before the Court sua sponte and on Plaintiff’s Response to the 16 Court’s prior Order to Show Cause (Dkt. #18). Dkt. #19. 17 This case was previously stayed pending resolution of the bankruptcy of Defendant 18 Jason R. Brown (Case No. 12-22025-MLB) and an adversary action filed by Triple B in 19 Bankruptcy Court (Case No. 13-01097-MLB). See Dkt. #18. Plaintiff was to file a status 20 report within 90 days. No status report was ever filed, several years passed, and on June 25, 21 2018, the Court issued a Minute Order for the parties to file a Joint Status Report informing the 22 Court of the status of the case and why the stay should not be lifted. The Court issued a 23 subsequent Order to Show Cause. Dkt. #18. 24 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 On July 23, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Response stating that the underlying bankruptcy matter had been resolved in 2015 and Plaintiff had simply failed to inform the Court. Dkt. #19. Plaintiff states that “this case can be dismissed and closed.” Id. Given the above, and after a review of the remainder of the record, the Court concludes that dismissal of this case is proper. The Court hereby finds and ORDERS that Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED and this case is CLOSED. 7 8 DATED this 24th day of July 2018. 9 A 10 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?