Meyer v. Receivables Performance Management, LLC

Filing 66

ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. The court GRANTS motion (Dkt. # 63 ) and directs Time Warner Cable to respond to the revised subpoena within one week of receiving this order. (CL)

HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

7
8
9

DEVON MEYER, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

10
11
12

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

RECEIVABLES PERFORMANCE
MANAGEMENT, LLC,
Defendant.
On February 11, 2014, the court issued an order requiring Time Warner Cable to
comply with a subpoena for the records of Plaintiff Bryce Finger. Time Warner
responded to the subpoena by indicating that it had no information for a Bryce Finger
corresponding to the account number listed on the subpoena. Defendant, who issued the
subpoena, later discovered that Mr. Finger’s records may be listed under the name “Bryce
Finder.”
Defendant attempted to convince Time Warner Cable to respond to a revised
subpoena naming “Bryce Finger aka Bryce Finder,” along with the same account number
from the original subpoena. Time Warner Cable refused to respond to the revised
subpoena without a court order.
The parties filed a joint motion seeking that order. The court GRANTS that
motion (Dkt. # 63) and directs Time Warner Cable to respond to the revised subpoena
within one week of receiving this order. The court declines at this time to decide whether

27
28

ORDER

v.

13
14

CASE NO. C12-2013RAJ

ORDER – 1

1

Time Warner’s refusal to respond to the revised subpoena without a second court order

2

was an act in contempt of court.

3

Dated this 29th day of April, 2014.

A

4
5
6

The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Court Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER – 2