Zakat v. Donahoe
Filing
32
ORDER granting 26 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(MD, mailed copy of order to pltf)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
AALIYAH ZAKAT,
11
12
13
14
CASE NO. C12-2252 MJP
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
v.
PATRICK R DONAHOE,
Defendant.
15
16
The Court has received and reviewed Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt.
17 No. 26), the accompanying exhibits and declarations (Dkt. Nos. 27 and 28) and Defendant’s
18 Notice to Plaintiff re Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 28). Plaintiff has submitted no
19 briefing in response to the motion.
20
Plaintiff instituted this action against the Postmaster General of the United States Postal
21 Service, alleging wrongful termination, harassment and mail tampering. Dkt. No. 7. Defendant
22 seeks summary judgment on the grounds that Plaintiff has failed to exhaust her administrative
23 remedies with respect to her Title VII claims, and additionally because her mail tampering claim
24
ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT- 1
1 is precluded under the Federal Tort Claims Act (which exempts claims “arising out of the loss,
2 miscarriage, or negligent transmission of letters or postal matter”). 28 U.S.C. § 2680(b).
3
Despite a notice from Defendant clearly spelling out for Plaintiff the effect of a summary
4 judgment ruling, her obligations regarding motions practice, and the consequences of a non5 response (Dkt. No. 28), Ms. Zakat has failed to file any responsive briefing. Under the local
6 rules of this district
7
If a party fails to file papers in opposition to a motion, such failure may be
considered by the court as an admission that the motion has merit.
8
LCR 7(b)(2). The Court does find that Plaintiff’s failure to respond to Defendant’s motion
9
constitutes an admission that the motion is meritorious. Accordingly,
10
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and
11
Plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
12
13
The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to Plaintiff and to all counsel.
14
Dated this 23rd day of September, 2013.
15
A
16
17
Marsha J. Pechman
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT- 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?