R.H. v. Premera Blue Cross et al
Filing
90
ORDER granting 81 Motion for final approval of settlement agreement; approving disbursements pursuant to settlement agreement; approving opt-outs; authorizing payment of late claims; Cy Pres Hearing set for 7/10/2015 at 09:00 AM by Judge Richard A Jones.(RS) cc fin'l
HON. RICHARD A. JONES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
9
10
11
12
13
14
R.H., by and through his parents and
guardians, P.H. and N.B.-H., individually, on
behalf of WASHINGTON ALLIANCE FOR
HEALTHCARE INSURANCE TRUST
HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN, and on behalf of
similarly situated individuals and plans,
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
18
v.
PREMERA BLUE CROSS, LIFEWISE
HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON
Defendants.
19
NO. 2:13-cv-00097-RAJ
[REVISED PROPOSED] ORDER:
(1) GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL
OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT;
(2) APPROVING DISBURSEMENTS
PURSUANT TO SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT;
(3) APPROVING OPT-OUTS;
(4) AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT
OF LATE CLAIMS; AND
(5) SCHEDULING A CY PRES
HEARING
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL
OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, ETC.
[Case No. 2:13-cv-00097-RAJ]
SIRIANNI YOUTZ
SPOONEMORE HAMBURGER
999 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 3650
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
TEL. (206) 223-0303 FAX (206) 223-0246
Upon consideration of the Plaintiff’s Motions for Final Approval, Attorney Fees,
1
2
Costs and Inventive Awards, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
(1)
3
With respect to the two classes involved in this action, the R.H. NDT
4
Settlement Class and the R.H. ABA Settlement Class (collectively “R.H. Classes”), the
5
Court approves the Settlement Agreement attached as Appendix 1 to the Motion for
6
Preliminary Approval as fair, reasonable and adequate to the class pursuant to FRCP
7
23.
(2)
8
The Court finds that the settlement notice to the R.H. Classes met the
9
requirements of Federal Civil Rule of Civil Procedure 23, due process and the
10
applicable law in that it fairly and adequately described the terms of the Agreement,
11
gave notice of the time and place of the hearing for final approval of the Agreement,
12
and described how a class member may comment on, opt out of, object to, or support
13
the Agreement. The Court finds that the direct mail notice process provided to the
14
R.H. Classes was the best notice practicable under the circumstances, and met the
15
requirements of FRCP 23 and due process.
(3)
16
Upon the occurrence of the conditions set forth in Section 2 of the
17
Settlement Agreement, the Court authorizes the payment of claims administration
18
costs/fees and notice costs (related to the two classes involved in this matter only) from
19
the Settlement Trust Fund to class counsel. Class counsel is also authorized to pay
20
additional administration and arbitration costs out of the Settlement Trust Fund as they
21
become due, as necessary. Class counsel shall document and submit those additional
22
invoices and payments in connection with cy pres hearing scheduled in paragraph 10,
23
below.
24
(4)
Upon the occurrence of the conditions set forth in Section 2 of the
25
Settlement Agreement, the Court authorizes the payment of $153,603.73 to the parents
26
of the named plaintiff in this action, R.H., to reimburse them for their out-of-pocket
ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL
OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, ETC. – 1
[Case No. 2:13-cv-00097-RAJ]
SIRIANNI YOUTZ
SPOONEMORE HAMBURGER
999 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 3650
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
TEL. (206) 223-0303 FAX (206) 223-0246
1
ABA costs as provided in Section 9 of the Settlement Agreement. Class counsel is
2
authorized to disburse these funds from the Settlement Trust Fund.
3
(5)
With respect to the work performed on behalf of the R.H Classes, the
4
Court awards class counsel a fee of 35% of the common cash fund allocated to this
5
action. No class member has objected to this amount, which is significant evidence that
6
the class members find the request to be fair. As the combined population of the R.H.
7
NDT Class and R.H. ABA Class is roughly equal to the combined size of the A.G. NDT
8
Class and the J.P. ABA Class, half of the common fund is fairly allocated to this action,
9
as the parties have done in the Settlement Agreement at Section 8.4.6.1. See also Dkt.
10
No. 69-1, Exh. A, p. 5 and Exh. B, p. 5 (population data for ERISA and non-ERISA class
11
members is roughly equal). As a result, for class counsel’s work in just this case before
12
this Court, it is awarded $612,500. This amount is fair and reasonable given that class
13
counsel obtained broad prospective relief and future benefits for both the R.H. Classes,
14
which far exceeds the value of just the cash fund. Dkt. No. 74, ¶¶9-10 (Decl. of Frank
15
Fox, Ph.D.); Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp., 142 F. Supp. 2d 1299, 1305 (W.D. Wa. 2001)
16
(benchmark fee looks at the total recovery obtained, “including future benefits.”). This
17
award also results in a multiplier of 3.3, which is well within an acceptable range. See
18
Vizcaino v. Microsoft, 290 F.3d 1043, 1051 (9th Cir. 2002) (multiplier of 3.65 “was within
19
the range of multipliers applied in common fund cases”). Upon the occurrence of the
20
conditions set forth in Section 2 of the Settlement Agreement, the Court awards these
21
attorney fees to class counsel for its efforts in this action, and authorizes the
22
disbursement of these funds from the Settlement Trust Fund to class counsel.
23
(6)
Upon the occurrence of the conditions set forth in Section 2 of the
24
Settlement Agreement, the Court awards litigation costs to class counsel in the amount
25
of $8,355.18, reflecting litigation costs to date in just this action. The Court authorizes
26
the disbursement of these funds from the Settlement Trust Fund.
ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL
OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, ETC. – 2
[Case No. 2:13-cv-00097-RAJ]
SIRIANNI YOUTZ
SPOONEMORE HAMBURGER
999 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 3650
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
TEL. (206) 223-0303 FAX (206) 223-0246
1
(7)
Upon the occurrence of the conditions set forth in Section 2 of the
2
Settlement Agreement, R.H., through his parents P.H. and N.B.-H., is awarded an
3
incentive award in the sum of $25,000. The Court authorizes the disbursement of these
4
funds from the Settlement Trust Fund.
5
(8)
Upon the occurrence of the conditions set forth in Section 2 of the
6
Settlement Agreement, the Court authorizes the payment of approved class member
7
claims in this action. The Court also authorizes the payment of the two late claims
8
identified by class counsel which were received prior to December 21, 2014, provided
9
they are otherwise approved by the claims administrator for payment. The Court
10
11
authorizes the disbursement of these funds from the Settlement Trust Fund
(9)
Individuals otherwise in the R.H. Classes who submitted opt-out forms,
12
attached at Exhibit B to Declaration of Eleanor Hamburger in Support of Plaintiff’s
13
Unopposed Motion for Final Approval of Settlement Agreement (Dkt. No. 82), are
14
excluded from the R.H. Classes, and are not subject to any provision of the Settlement
15
Agreement.
16
17
18
(10)
A hearing to consider the distribution of cy pres funds is scheduled for
July 10, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.
It is so ORDERED this 21st day of January, 2015.
19
A
20
21
The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Judge
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL
OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, ETC. – 3
[Case No. 2:13-cv-00097-RAJ]
SIRIANNI YOUTZ
SPOONEMORE HAMBURGER
999 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 3650
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
TEL. (206) 223-0303 FAX (206) 223-0246
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?