Carrigan v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 13

ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. The court ORDERS plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE why the court should not grant defendants' 9 motion to dismiss in its entirety for failure to oppose. Local Civ. R. 7(b)(2). Plaintiff shall respond within five days of this order. (CL)

1

HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES

2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

8
9
10

JAMES L. CARRIGAN,

11

Plaintiff,

12

14

ORDER

v.

13

CASE NO. C13-276 RAJ

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.
Defendants.

15
16
17

This matter comes before the court sua sponte. On February 20, 2013, defendants

18 filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Dkt. # 9. The motion was noted for
19 consideration on March 22, 2013. To-date, plaintiff has not filed an opposition. The
20 court ORDERS plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE why the court should not grant defendants’
21 motion to dismiss in its entirety for failure to oppose. Local Civ. R. 7(b)(2). Plaintiff
22 shall respond within five days of this order.
23

Dated this 8th day of May, 2013.

25

A

26

The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Judge

24

27

ORDER- 1