Carrigan v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. The court ORDERS plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE why the court should not grant defendants' 9 motion to dismiss in its entirety for failure to oppose. Local Civ. R. 7(b)(2). Plaintiff shall respond within five days of this order. (CL)
HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
JAMES L. CARRIGAN,
CASE NO. C13-276 RAJ
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.
This matter comes before the court sua sponte. On February 20, 2013, defendants
18 filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Dkt. # 9. The motion was noted for
19 consideration on March 22, 2013. To-date, plaintiff has not filed an opposition. The
20 court ORDERS plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE why the court should not grant defendants’
21 motion to dismiss in its entirety for failure to oppose. Local Civ. R. 7(b)(2). Plaintiff
22 shall respond within five days of this order.
Dated this 8th day of May, 2013.
The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?