Carrigan v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 14

ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. The court GRANTS defendants' 9 motion to dismiss due to plaintiff's failure to oppose the motion or respond to the courts order to show cause. Local Civ. R. 7(b)(2) (CL)

1

HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES

2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

8
9
10

JAMES L. CARRIGAN,

11

Plaintiff,

12

14

ORDER

v.

13

CASE NO. C13-276 RAJ

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.
Defendants.

15
16
17

This matter comes before the court on the court’s order to show cause. Dkt. # 13.

18 On February 20, 2013, defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
19 Dkt. # 9. The motion was noted for consideration on March 22, 2013. The plaintiff did
20 not file an opposition. On May 8, 2013, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause why the
21 court should not grant defendants’ motion to dismiss in its entirety for failure to oppose.
22 Dkt. # 13. The court ordered plaintiff to respond within five days of the May 8, 2013
23 order. To-date, plaintiff has not responded to the order to show cause or otherwise
24 opposed defendants’ motion. Accordingly, the court GRANTS defendants’ motion to
25 dismiss due to plaintiff’s failure to oppose the motion or respond to the court’s order to
26 show cause. Local Civ. R. 7(b)(2)
27

ORDER- 1

1

Dated this 28th day of May, 2013.

3

A

4

The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Judge

2

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

ORDER- 2