Zembezia Film (Pty) Ltd v. Does 1-66
Filing
9
ORDER QUASHING SUBPOENA by Judge Robert S. Lasnik; The subpoena issued to Comcast regarding IP address 76.28.192.131 is QUASHED as moot. (TF) cc: A Markhotok
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
ZEMBEZIA FILM LTD.,
9
Plaintiff,
Case No. C13-0309RAJ-RSL
10
11
v.
ORDER QUASHING SUBPOENA
DOES 1 - 66,
12
Defendants.
13
14
15
This matter comes before the Court on a letter seeking to quash a subpoena
16
issued to Comcast and to dismiss the above-captioned matter. Dkt. # 8. The subpoena
17
appears to be moot as it relates to IP address 76.28.192.131. The Court granted leave for
18
preliminary discovery for the purpose of identifying the Doe defendants: that purpose has
19
now been accomplished insofar as Anna Markhotok is concerned. Plaintiff has the
20
information it needs to serve Doe 58.
21
Quashing the subpoena will not, however, end or preclude this action for
22
copyright infringement. To the contrary, plaintiff will then have an opportunity to affect
23
personal service of the complaint, at which point defendant may file a response.1
24
25
26
1
If and when service is accomplished on Ms. Markhotok, she may want to review Fed.
R. Civ. P. 12 when evaluating her options for presenting defenses and objections.
ORDER QUASHING SUBPOENA - 1
1
2
For all of the foregoing reasons, the subpoena issued to Comcast regarding
IP address 76.28.192.131 is QUASHED as moot.
3
4
Dated this 2nd day of May, 2013.
5
A
6
Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER QUASHING SUBPOENA - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?