Imeson v. Eagle View Technologies, Inc.
Filing
46
ORDER granting 44 Stipulated Motion to extend deadline for deft to serve pretrial statement, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(MD)
THE HONORABLE MARSHA J. PECHMAN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
CINDY IMESON,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
No. 2:13-cv-00468-MJP
v.
EAGLE VIEW TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
and DOES 1-5 inclusive,
14
Defendants.
STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER
TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR
DEFENDANT TO SERVE PRETRIAL
STATEMENT
NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR:
April 4, 2014
15
16
1.
Pursuant to the Order Setting Trial Date & Related Dates entered by this Court
17
on May 30, 2013 (“May 30, 2013 Order”), the agreed pretrial order is due on April 30, 2014.
18
Dkt. No. 10.
19
20
21
2.
Pursuant to the May 30, 2013 Order and LCR 16(h), plaintiff’s deadline to
serve her pretrial statement on defendant Eagle View Technologies, Inc. is March 31, 2014.
3.
Plaintiff has not yet served her pretrial statement as of the date of this motion.
22
Declaration of Nicole Tadano in Support of Stipulated Motion to Extend Deadline to Serve
23
Pretrial Statement (“Tadano Decl.”) ¶ 2.
24
4.
Pursuant to the May 30, 2013 Order and LCR 16(i), defendant Eagle View’s
25
pretrial statement is due April 10, 2014. Eagle View is required to make objections, additions,
26
or changes to portions of plaintiff’s pretrial statement; identify witnesses not already identified
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO
SERVE PRETRIAL STATEMENT - 1
2:13-cv-00468-MJP
DLA Piper LLP (US)
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7000
Seattle, WA 98104-7044 | Tel: 206.839.4800
1
by plaintiff; list exhibits not already listed by plaintiff; and otherwise respond to plaintiff’s
2
pretrial statement within the 10 days allotted to Eagle View under LCR 16.
3
4
5
5.
The Court may, for good cause, extend the time with motion if a request is made
before the original time expires.
6.
The parties’ counsel have conferred, and plaintiff’s counsel has agreed to serve
6
plaintiff’s pretrial statement as soon as practicable, which plaintiff’s counsel asserts is April 7,
7
2014. Tadano Decl. ¶ 3.
8
9
10
11
7.
The parties stipulate and respectfully request that the Court grant this motion
and extend the deadline for Eagle View to serve its pretrial statement to April 17, 2014.
Respectfully submitted this 4th day of April, 2014.
PREMIER LAW GROUP, PLLC
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
13
s/ Ada Wong (with permission)
14
Ada K. Wong, WSBA No. 45936
3380 146th Place SE, Suite 430
Bellevue, WA 98007
Tel: (206) 285-1743
Fax: (206) 599-6316
Email: ada@plg-pllc.com
s/ Nicole M. Tadano
Nicole M. Tadano, WSBA No. 40531
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7000
Seattle, WA 98104
Tel: (206) 839-4800 / Fax: (206) 839-4801
Email: nicole.tadano@dlapiper.com
12
15
16
17
Attorney for Defendant
Eagle View Technologies, Inc.
Attorney for Plaintiff Cindy Imeson
18
19
ORDER
20
21
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
DATED: April 7, 2014
23
A
24
25
Marsha J. Pechman
Chief United States District Judge
26
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO
SERVE PRETRIAL STATEMENT - 2
2:13-cv-00468-MJP
DLA Piper LLP (US)
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7000
Seattle, WA 98104-7044 | Tel: 206.839.4800
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
I hereby certify that on April 4, 2014, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk
3
of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to all counsel
4
of record:
5
Andrew Ramiro Escobar
andrew.escobar@dlapiper.com,karen.hansen@dlapiper.com
Darryl Parker
dparker@plg–pllc.com,carrie@plg–pllc.com,smith@plg–pllc.com,ada@plg–pllc.com
Nicole M. Tadano
nicole.tadano@dlapiper.com,patsy.howson@dlapiper.com
Ada Ko Wong
ada@plg–pllc.com,smith@plg–pllc.com,adakowong.esq@gmail.com,darryl@plg–
pllc.com
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Dated this 4th day of April, 2014.
14
s/ Nicole M. Tadano
Nicole M. Tadano, WSBA No. 40531
15
16
17
WEST\247692912.1
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO
SERVE PRETRIAL STATEMENT - 3
2:13-cv-00468-MJP
DLA Piper LLP (US)
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7000
Seattle, WA 98104-7044 | Tel: 206.839.4800
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?