Bunge Limited et al v. Bungechicago.com

Filing 18

ORDER granting pltfs' 9 Motion for leave to proceed on an in rem basis by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(RS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 BUNGE LIMITED, et al., 9 10 11 Plaintiffs, Case No. C13-0621RSL v. BUNGECHICAGO.COM, 12 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S LEAVE TO PROCEED ON AN IN REM BASIS Defendant. 13 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on “Plaintiffs’ Motion to Proceed on an 16 In Rem Basis” in the above-captioned matter. Dkt. # 9. The Court finds that plaintiffs 17 have attempted, through all ordinary and customary means, to contact the owner of the 18 defendant domain name. Some of the attempted communications were unsuccessful 19 because of false addresses used by the domain name registrant and on the allegedly 20 infringing website. No response was received to the communications that were 21 successful. 22 Plaintiffs’ motion is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiffs may proceed on an in 23 rem basis pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)(2)(A)(ii) and need not publicize notice 24 pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)(2)(A)(ii)(II)(bb). 25 26 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S LEAVE TO PROCEED ON AN IN REM BASIS - 1 1 Dated this 16th day of May, 2013. 2 A Robert S. Lasnik 3 United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S LEAVE TO PROCEED ON AN IN REM BASIS - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?