Bunge Limited et al v. Bungechicago.com
Filing
18
ORDER granting pltfs' 9 Motion for leave to proceed on an in rem basis by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(RS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
BUNGE LIMITED, et al.,
9
10
11
Plaintiffs,
Case No. C13-0621RSL
v.
BUNGECHICAGO.COM,
12
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
LEAVE TO PROCEED ON AN IN
REM BASIS
Defendant.
13
14
15
This matter comes before the Court on “Plaintiffs’ Motion to Proceed on an
16
In Rem Basis” in the above-captioned matter. Dkt. # 9. The Court finds that plaintiffs
17
have attempted, through all ordinary and customary means, to contact the owner of the
18
defendant domain name. Some of the attempted communications were unsuccessful
19
because of false addresses used by the domain name registrant and on the allegedly
20
infringing website. No response was received to the communications that were
21
successful.
22
Plaintiffs’ motion is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiffs may proceed on an in
23
rem basis pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)(2)(A)(ii) and need not publicize notice
24
pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)(2)(A)(ii)(II)(bb).
25
26
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S LEAVE
TO PROCEED ON AN IN REM BASIS - 1
1
Dated this 16th day of May, 2013.
2
A
Robert S. Lasnik
3
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S LEAVE
TO PROCEED ON AN IN REM BASIS - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?