Bunge Limited et al v. Bungechicago.com
Filing
39
ORDER granting pltf's 37 Second Motion for Summary Judgment and directing transfer of domain name by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(RS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
BUNGE LIMITED, et al.,
9
10
11
Plaintiffs,
Case No. C13-0621RSL
v.
BUNGECHICAGO.COM,
12
Defendant.
13
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
SECOND MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
DIRECTING TRANSFER OF
DOMAIN NAME
14
15
This matter comes before the Court on “Plaintiff’s Second Motion for
16
Summary Judgment Concerning the New Infringing Domains.” Dkt. # 37. Defendants
17
have not appeared or opposed the motion. The Court considers the failure to file an
18
opposition “an admission that the motion has merit.” LCR 7(b)(2). The Court has also
19
reviewed the motion on its merits and finds that summary judgment is appropriate.
20
The Clerk of Court is therefore directed to enter judgment in favor of
21
plaintiff and against defendants. The Court further directs eNOM, Inc., the registrar and
22
custodian of the domain names BUNGECHICAGOINC.COM, BUNGE-
23
CHICAGO.COM, BUNGE-CHICAGOINC.COM, and BUNGE-
24
CHICAGOINCORPORATED.COM, to transfer the domain names to plaintiff Bunge
25
Limited.
26
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT - 1
1
Dated this 23rd day of July, 2014.
2
A
Robert S. Lasnik
3
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?