Bunge Limited et al v. Bungechicago.com

Filing 39

ORDER granting pltf's 37 Second Motion for Summary Judgment and directing transfer of domain name by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(RS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 BUNGE LIMITED, et al., 9 10 11 Plaintiffs, Case No. C13-0621RSL v. BUNGECHICAGO.COM, 12 Defendant. 13 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DIRECTING TRANSFER OF DOMAIN NAME 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on “Plaintiff’s Second Motion for 16 Summary Judgment Concerning the New Infringing Domains.” Dkt. # 37. Defendants 17 have not appeared or opposed the motion. The Court considers the failure to file an 18 opposition “an admission that the motion has merit.” LCR 7(b)(2). The Court has also 19 reviewed the motion on its merits and finds that summary judgment is appropriate. 20 The Clerk of Court is therefore directed to enter judgment in favor of 21 plaintiff and against defendants. The Court further directs eNOM, Inc., the registrar and 22 custodian of the domain names BUNGECHICAGOINC.COM, BUNGE- 23 CHICAGO.COM, BUNGE-CHICAGOINC.COM, and BUNGE- 24 CHICAGOINCORPORATED.COM, to transfer the domain names to plaintiff Bunge 25 Limited. 26 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT - 1 1 Dated this 23rd day of July, 2014. 2 A Robert S. Lasnik 3 United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?