Herbert v. Vertucci et al

Filing 54

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; dfts' motion for summ jgm is granted and pltf's cross motion for summ jgm is denied by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (RS) cc Herbert

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 ANTHONY G. HERBERT, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 Case No. C13-640-RSL v. CARYN VERTUCCI, D.D.S., et al., Defendants. 14 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S CROSSMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 15 The Court, having reviewed plaintiff’s complaint, defendants’ motion for summary 16 judgment, plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment, the Report and Recommendation of 17 the Honorable James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge, and the remaining record, 18 does hereby find and ORDER: 19 (1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. (2) Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 30) is GRANTED and 20 21 plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 42) is DENIED. 22 23 ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - 1 1 (3) Plaintiff’s complaint (Dkt. 7) and this action are DISMISSED with prejudice. 2 (4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, to counsel for 3 defendants, and to the Honorable James P. Donohue. 4 DATED this 29th day of May, 2014. 5 6 A ROBERT S. LASNIK 7 United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?