Trader Joe's Company v. Hallatt et al
Filing
110
MINUTE ORDER directing Plaintiff to file a response to Defendant's 107 SEALED MOTION to Reconsider Order Affirming Arbitration Award 103 ; Response due 8/28/2017; No Reply at this time. Authorized by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (PM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
TRADER JOE'S COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
v.
CASE NO. C13-768 BJR
MINUTE ORDER RE:
MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
MICHAEL NORMAN HALLATT,
Defendant.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable Barbara
J. Rothstein, United States District Judge:
The Court, having received and reviewed the motion for reconsideration of the Order
Affirming Arbitration Award (Dkt. No. 107) filed by Defendant, rules as follows:
The Court calls for a response from Plaintiff to Defendant’s motion, in accordance with
Local Rule 7(h)(3). Regarding Plaintiff’s responsive brief:
22
(1) Fairness dictates that Plaintiff be permitted a response brief of equal length to
23
Defendant’s moving papers. Including the supplemental pleadings filed by
24
MINUTE ORDER RE: - 1
1
Defendant, the Court calculates that page length at 34 pages. Plaintiff’s response
2
shall not exceed 34 pages and the Court sincerely hopes it can adequately articulate
3
its position in fewer.
4
(2) Plaintiff’s response brief shall be due no later than August 28, 2017.
5
No reply brief from Defendant is authorized at this time. If the Court requires a reply
6
brief from Defendant, he will be so notified.
7
8
The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to Defendant and to all counsel.
9
Filed August 16, 2017.
10
William M. McCool
Clerk of Court
11
s/Paula McNabb
Deputy Clerk
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?