Yates v. Sinclair

Filing 80

ORDER granting Agreed 79 Motion for service by US Marshals of subpoenas for evidentiary hearing by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)cc USMO w/285 forms/subpoenas/Order

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 ROBERT LEE YATES, JR., NO. C13-0842 RSM Petitioner, 10 11 12 ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION RE SERVICE OF SUBPOENAS FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING v. STEPHEN D. SINCLAIR, 13 Respondent. THIS IS A CAPITAL CASE 14 15 This matter having come before the Court on the Parties’ Agreed Motion for Service 16 of Subpoenas for Evidentiary Hearing and the Court being fully advised, it is therefore 17 ordered: 18 The Parties Agreed Motion Re Service of Subpoenas for Evidentiary Hearing is 19 GRANTED. It is hereby Ordered that the U.S. Marshal’s Service, at the Government’s 20 21 expense, shall timely serve the attached deposition subpoenas. The Court authorizes the 22 payment of travel and subsistence fees for each fact witness. The Clerk of the Court shall 23 send a certified copy of this Order to the U.S. Marshal’s Office, at which point the U.S. 24 Marshal’s Service will be directed to serve the subpoenas in a timely manner. Once the 25 26 subpoenas have been served, the U.S. Marshal’s Service shall return a confirmed copy of the certificate of service to the Court, which will then be filed under seal. ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION – 1 C13-0842 RSM Allen, Hansen, Maybrown & Offenbecher, P.S. 600 University Street, Suite 3020 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 447-9681 1 2 Done this 15th day of February, 2017. 3 A 4 5 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 Presented by: 9 s/Todd Maybrown Todd Maybrown Allen, Hansen, Maybrown & Offenbecher, P.S. Attorney for Petitioner 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION – 2 C13-0842 RSM Allen, Hansen, Maybrown & Offenbecher, P.S. 600 University Street, Suite 3020 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 447-9681

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?