Yates v. Sinclair
Filing
80
ORDER granting Agreed 79 Motion for service by US Marshals of subpoenas for evidentiary hearing by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)cc USMO w/285 forms/subpoenas/Order
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
ROBERT LEE YATES, JR.,
NO. C13-0842 RSM
Petitioner,
10
11
12
ORDER GRANTING AGREED
MOTION RE SERVICE OF SUBPOENAS
FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING
v.
STEPHEN D. SINCLAIR,
13
Respondent.
THIS IS A CAPITAL CASE
14
15
This matter having come before the Court on the Parties’ Agreed Motion for Service
16
of Subpoenas for Evidentiary Hearing and the Court being fully advised, it is therefore
17
ordered:
18
The Parties Agreed Motion Re Service of Subpoenas for Evidentiary Hearing is
19
GRANTED. It is hereby Ordered that the U.S. Marshal’s Service, at the Government’s
20
21
expense, shall timely serve the attached deposition subpoenas.
The Court authorizes the
22
payment of travel and subsistence fees for each fact witness. The Clerk of the Court shall
23
send a certified copy of this Order to the U.S. Marshal’s Office, at which point the U.S.
24
Marshal’s Service will be directed to serve the subpoenas in a timely manner. Once the
25
26
subpoenas have been served, the U.S. Marshal’s Service shall return a confirmed copy of the
certificate of service to the Court, which will then be filed under seal.
ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION – 1
C13-0842 RSM
Allen, Hansen, Maybrown
& Offenbecher, P.S.
600 University Street, Suite 3020
Seattle, Washington 98101
(206) 447-9681
1
2
Done this 15th day of February, 2017.
3
A
4
5
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
Presented by:
9
s/Todd Maybrown
Todd Maybrown
Allen, Hansen, Maybrown & Offenbecher, P.S.
Attorney for Petitioner
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION – 2
C13-0842 RSM
Allen, Hansen, Maybrown
& Offenbecher, P.S.
600 University Street, Suite 3020
Seattle, Washington 98101
(206) 447-9681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?