Strich v. Accelitec, Inc.
Filing
18
AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (TF)
1
The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
9
10 RONALD F. STRICH,
No. 2:13-cv-01092-RSL
11
AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY
OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED
INFORMATION AND ORDER
12
13
14
15
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
ACCELITEC, INC., a Washington corporation, )
)
Defendant.
)
)
The parties hereby stipulate to the following provisions regarding the discovery of
16
electronically stored information (“ESI”) in this matter:
17
A.
General Principles
18
1.
An attorney’s zealous representation of a client is not compromised by conducting
19
discovery in a cooperative manner. The failure of counsel or the parties to litigation to cooperate in
20
facilitating and reasonably limiting discovery requests and responses raises litigation costs and
21
contributes to the risk of sanctions.
22
2.
The proportionality standard set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2)(C) must be applied
23
in each case when formulating a discovery plan. To further the application of the proportionality
24
standard in discovery, requests for production of ESI and related responses should be reasonably
25
targeted, clear, and as specific as possible.
26
AGREEMENT RE: DISCOVERY OF
ELECTRONICALLY STORED
INFORMATION AND ORDER -- 1
No. 2:13-cv-01092-RSL
m43957-2027625_2.doc
GRAHAM & DUNN PC
Pier 70, 2801 Alaskan Way ~ Suite 300
Seattle, Washington 98121-1128
(206) 624-8300/Fax: (206) 340-9599
1 B.
ESI Disclosures
2
Within 30 days after August 20, 2013, each party shall disclose:
3
1.
Custodians.
The five custodians most likely to have discoverable ESI in their
4 possession, custody or control. The custodians shall be identified by name, title, connection to the
5 instant litigation, and the type of the information under his/her control.
6
2.
Non-custodial Data Sources. A list of non-custodial data sources (e.g. shared drives,
7 servers, etc.), if any, likely to contain discoverable ESI.
8
3.
Third-Party Data Sources. A list of third-party data sources, if any, likely to contain
9 discoverable ESI (e.g. third-party email and/or mobile device providers, “cloud” storage, etc.) and,
10 for each such source, the extent to which a party is (or is not) able to preserve information stored in
11 the third-party data source.
12
4.
Inaccessible Data. A list of data sources, if any, likely to contain discoverable ESI
13 (by type, date, custodian, electronic system or other criteria sufficient to specifically identify the data
14 source) that a party asserts is not reasonably accessible under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2)(C)(i). Section
15 (C)(2)(a) below sets forth data sources and ESI which are not required to be preserved by the parties.
16 Those data sources and ESI do not need to be included on this list.
17 C.
Preservation of ESI
18
The parties acknowledge that they have a common law obligation to take reasonable and
19 proportional steps to preserve discoverable information in the party’s possession, custody or control.
20 With respect to preservation of ESI, the parties agree as follows:
21
1.
Absent a showing of good cause by the requesting party, the parties shall not be
22 required to modify the procedures used by them in the ordinary course of business to back-up and
23 archive data; provided, however, that the parties shall preserve all discoverable ESI in their
24 possession, custody or control. All parties shall supplement their disclosures in accordance with
25 Rule 26(e) with discoverable ESI responsive to a particular discovery request or mandatory
26
AGREEMENT RE: DISCOVERY OF
ELECTRONICALLY STORED
INFORMATION AND ORDER -- 2
No. 2:13-cv-01092-RSL
m43957-2027625_2.doc
GRAHAM & DUNN PC
Pier 70, 2801 Alaskan Way ~ Suite 300
Seattle, Washington 98121-1128
(206) 624-8300/Fax: (206) 340-9599
1 disclosure where that data is created after a disclosure or response is made (unless excluded under
2 (C)(2) or (D)(1)-(2) below).
3
2.
Absent a showing of good cause by the requesting party, the following categories of
4 ESI need not be preserved:
5
a.
Deleted, slack, fragmented, or other data only accessible by forensics.
6
b.
Random access memory (RAM), temporary files, or other ephemeral data
7
that are difficult to preserve without disabling the operating system.
8
c.
9
On-line access data such as temporary internet files, history, cache, cookies,
and the like.
10
d.
11
Data in metadata fields that are frequently updated automatically, such as
last-opened dates (see also Section (E)(5)).
12
e.
13
Back-up data that are substantially duplicative of data that are more
accessible elsewhere.
14
f.
Server, system or network logs.
15
g.
Data remaining from systems no longer in use that is unintelligible on the
16
systems in use.
17
h.
Electronic data (e.g. email, calendars, contact data, and notes) sent to or from
18
mobile devices (e.g., iPhone, iPad, Android, and Blackberry devices),
19
provided that a copy of all such electronic data is routinely saved elsewhere
20
(such as on a server, laptop, desktop computer, or “cloud” storage).
21
22
D.
Privilege
1.
With respect to privileged or work-product information generated after the filing of
23 the complaint, parties are not required to include any such information in privilege logs.
24
2.
Activities undertaken in compliance with the duty to preserve information are
25 protected from disclosure and discovery under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(3)(A) and (B).
26
AGREEMENT RE: DISCOVERY OF
ELECTRONICALLY STORED
INFORMATION AND ORDER -- 3
No. 2:13-cv-01092-RSL
m43957-2027625_2.doc
GRAHAM & DUNN PC
Pier 70, 2801 Alaskan Way ~ Suite 300
Seattle, Washington 98121-1128
(206) 624-8300/Fax: (206) 340-9599
1
3.
Information produced in discovery that is protected as privileged or work product
2 shall be immediately returned to the producing party, and its production shall not constitute a waiver
3 of such protection, if: (i) such information appears on its face to have been inadvertently produced
4 or (ii) the producing party provides notice within 15 days of discovery by the producing party of the
5 inadvertent production.
6 E.
ESI Discovery Procedures
7
1.
On-site inspection of electronic media. Such an inspection shall not be permitted
8 absent a demonstration by the requesting party of specific need and good cause or by agreement of
9 the parties.
10
2.
Search methodology. The parties shall attempt to reach agreement on appropriate
11 search terms, or an appropriate computer- or technology-aided methodology, before any such effort
12 is undertaken. The parties shall continue to cooperate in revising the appropriateness of the search
13 terms or computer- or technology-aided methodology.
14
a.
A producing party shall disclose what search terms, if any, were used to
15 locate ESI likely to contain discoverable information. If search terms were not used, the producing
16 party shall disclose the search methodology used to locate ESI likely to contain discoverable
17 information.
18
b.
If search terms were used to locate ESI likely to contain discoverable
19 information, a requesting party is entitled to no more than 5 additional terms or queries to be used in
20 connection with further electronic searches absent a showing of good cause or agreement of the
21 parties. The parties shall confer in good faith on the 5 additional terms or queries. Focused terms
22 and queries, rather than overbroad ones (e.g., product and company names), should be employed.
23
c.
Absent a showing of good cause, search terms returning more than 250
24 megabytes of data are presumed to be overbroad.
25
d.
The producing party shall search both non-custodial data sources and ESI
26 maintained by the custodians identified pursuant to section B(1).
AGREEMENT RE: DISCOVERY OF
ELECTRONICALLY STORED
INFORMATION AND ORDER -- 4
No. 2:13-cv-01092-RSL
m43957-2027625_2.doc
GRAHAM & DUNN PC
Pier 70, 2801 Alaskan Way ~ Suite 300
Seattle, Washington 98121-1128
(206) 624-8300/Fax: (206) 340-9599
1
3.
Format. The parties agree that ESI will be produced to the requesting party with
2 searchable text, in a format to be decided between the parties. Acceptable formats include, but are
3 not limited to, native, TIFF (with a companion text file), and searchable PDF. Unless otherwise
4 agreed to by the parties, files that are not easily converted to image format, such as spreadsheet,
5 database and drawing files, should be produced in native format.
6
4.
De-duplication. The parties may de-duplicate their ESI production across custodial
7 and non-custodial data sources after disclosure to the requesting party.
8
5.
Metadata fields. If the requesting party seeks metadata, the parties agree that only
9 the following metadata fields need be produced: document type; custodian and duplicate custodians;
10 author/from; recipient/to, cc and bcc; title/subject; file name and size; original file path; date and
11 time created, sent, modified and/or received; and hash value.
12
13
DATED: September 6, 2013.
PLAINTIFF RONALD F. STRICH
DEFENDANT ACCELITEC, INC.
14
By: s/Daniel J. Oates
15 Daniel J. Oates, WSBA #39334
Aimee K. Decker, WSBA #41797
16
GRAHAM & DUNN PC
17 Pier 70, 2801 Alaskan Way Ste 300
Seattle, WA 98121-1128
18 Tel: (206) 340-9631 (Oates)
Tel: (206) 340-9625 (Decker)
19 Fax: (206) 340-9599
20 Email: doates@grahamdunn.com
Email: adecker@grahamdunn.com
21 Attorneys for Plaintiff
By: s/Kenneth L. Karlberg
Kenneth L. Karlberg, WSBA #18781
KARLBERG & ASSOCIATES, PLLC
909 Squalicum Way Ste 110
Bellingham, WA 98225
Tel: (360) 325-7774
Email: ken@karlberglaw.com
Attorney for Defendant
22
23
24
25
26
AGREEMENT RE: DISCOVERY OF
ELECTRONICALLY STORED
INFORMATION AND ORDER -- 5
No. 2:13-cv-01092-RSL
m43957-2027625_2.doc
GRAHAM & DUNN PC
Pier 70, 2801 Alaskan Way ~ Suite 300
Seattle, Washington 98121-1128
(206) 624-8300/Fax: (206) 340-9599
1
2
ORDER
Based on the foregoing, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
DATE: September 10, 2013
4
A Lasnik
The Honorable Robert S.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
AGREEMENT RE: DISCOVERY OF
ELECTRONICALLY STORED
INFORMATION AND ORDER -- 6
No. 2:13-cv-01092-RSL
m43957-2027625_2.doc
GRAHAM & DUNN PC
Pier 70, 2801 Alaskan Way ~ Suite 300
Seattle, Washington 98121-1128
(206) 624-8300/Fax: (206) 340-9599
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?