Strich v. Accelitec, Inc.

Filing 18

AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (TF)

Download PDF
1 The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 RONALD F. STRICH, No. 2:13-cv-01092-RSL 11 AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER 12 13 14 15 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ACCELITEC, INC., a Washington corporation, ) ) Defendant. ) ) The parties hereby stipulate to the following provisions regarding the discovery of 16 electronically stored information (“ESI”) in this matter: 17 A. General Principles 18 1. An attorney’s zealous representation of a client is not compromised by conducting 19 discovery in a cooperative manner. The failure of counsel or the parties to litigation to cooperate in 20 facilitating and reasonably limiting discovery requests and responses raises litigation costs and 21 contributes to the risk of sanctions. 22 2. The proportionality standard set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2)(C) must be applied 23 in each case when formulating a discovery plan. To further the application of the proportionality 24 standard in discovery, requests for production of ESI and related responses should be reasonably 25 targeted, clear, and as specific as possible. 26 AGREEMENT RE: DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER -- 1 No. 2:13-cv-01092-RSL m43957-2027625_2.doc GRAHAM & DUNN PC Pier 70, 2801 Alaskan Way ~ Suite 300 Seattle, Washington 98121-1128 (206) 624-8300/Fax: (206) 340-9599 1 B. ESI Disclosures 2 Within 30 days after August 20, 2013, each party shall disclose: 3 1. Custodians. The five custodians most likely to have discoverable ESI in their 4 possession, custody or control. The custodians shall be identified by name, title, connection to the 5 instant litigation, and the type of the information under his/her control. 6 2. Non-custodial Data Sources. A list of non-custodial data sources (e.g. shared drives, 7 servers, etc.), if any, likely to contain discoverable ESI. 8 3. Third-Party Data Sources. A list of third-party data sources, if any, likely to contain 9 discoverable ESI (e.g. third-party email and/or mobile device providers, “cloud” storage, etc.) and, 10 for each such source, the extent to which a party is (or is not) able to preserve information stored in 11 the third-party data source. 12 4. Inaccessible Data. A list of data sources, if any, likely to contain discoverable ESI 13 (by type, date, custodian, electronic system or other criteria sufficient to specifically identify the data 14 source) that a party asserts is not reasonably accessible under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2)(C)(i). Section 15 (C)(2)(a) below sets forth data sources and ESI which are not required to be preserved by the parties. 16 Those data sources and ESI do not need to be included on this list. 17 C. Preservation of ESI 18 The parties acknowledge that they have a common law obligation to take reasonable and 19 proportional steps to preserve discoverable information in the party’s possession, custody or control. 20 With respect to preservation of ESI, the parties agree as follows: 21 1. Absent a showing of good cause by the requesting party, the parties shall not be 22 required to modify the procedures used by them in the ordinary course of business to back-up and 23 archive data; provided, however, that the parties shall preserve all discoverable ESI in their 24 possession, custody or control. All parties shall supplement their disclosures in accordance with 25 Rule 26(e) with discoverable ESI responsive to a particular discovery request or mandatory 26 AGREEMENT RE: DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER -- 2 No. 2:13-cv-01092-RSL m43957-2027625_2.doc GRAHAM & DUNN PC Pier 70, 2801 Alaskan Way ~ Suite 300 Seattle, Washington 98121-1128 (206) 624-8300/Fax: (206) 340-9599 1 disclosure where that data is created after a disclosure or response is made (unless excluded under 2 (C)(2) or (D)(1)-(2) below). 3 2. Absent a showing of good cause by the requesting party, the following categories of 4 ESI need not be preserved: 5 a. Deleted, slack, fragmented, or other data only accessible by forensics. 6 b. Random access memory (RAM), temporary files, or other ephemeral data 7 that are difficult to preserve without disabling the operating system. 8 c. 9 On-line access data such as temporary internet files, history, cache, cookies, and the like. 10 d. 11 Data in metadata fields that are frequently updated automatically, such as last-opened dates (see also Section (E)(5)). 12 e. 13 Back-up data that are substantially duplicative of data that are more accessible elsewhere. 14 f. Server, system or network logs. 15 g. Data remaining from systems no longer in use that is unintelligible on the 16 systems in use. 17 h. Electronic data (e.g. email, calendars, contact data, and notes) sent to or from 18 mobile devices (e.g., iPhone, iPad, Android, and Blackberry devices), 19 provided that a copy of all such electronic data is routinely saved elsewhere 20 (such as on a server, laptop, desktop computer, or “cloud” storage). 21 22 D. Privilege 1. With respect to privileged or work-product information generated after the filing of 23 the complaint, parties are not required to include any such information in privilege logs. 24 2. Activities undertaken in compliance with the duty to preserve information are 25 protected from disclosure and discovery under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(3)(A) and (B). 26 AGREEMENT RE: DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER -- 3 No. 2:13-cv-01092-RSL m43957-2027625_2.doc GRAHAM & DUNN PC Pier 70, 2801 Alaskan Way ~ Suite 300 Seattle, Washington 98121-1128 (206) 624-8300/Fax: (206) 340-9599 1 3. Information produced in discovery that is protected as privileged or work product 2 shall be immediately returned to the producing party, and its production shall not constitute a waiver 3 of such protection, if: (i) such information appears on its face to have been inadvertently produced 4 or (ii) the producing party provides notice within 15 days of discovery by the producing party of the 5 inadvertent production. 6 E. ESI Discovery Procedures 7 1. On-site inspection of electronic media. Such an inspection shall not be permitted 8 absent a demonstration by the requesting party of specific need and good cause or by agreement of 9 the parties. 10 2. Search methodology. The parties shall attempt to reach agreement on appropriate 11 search terms, or an appropriate computer- or technology-aided methodology, before any such effort 12 is undertaken. The parties shall continue to cooperate in revising the appropriateness of the search 13 terms or computer- or technology-aided methodology. 14 a. A producing party shall disclose what search terms, if any, were used to 15 locate ESI likely to contain discoverable information. If search terms were not used, the producing 16 party shall disclose the search methodology used to locate ESI likely to contain discoverable 17 information. 18 b. If search terms were used to locate ESI likely to contain discoverable 19 information, a requesting party is entitled to no more than 5 additional terms or queries to be used in 20 connection with further electronic searches absent a showing of good cause or agreement of the 21 parties. The parties shall confer in good faith on the 5 additional terms or queries. Focused terms 22 and queries, rather than overbroad ones (e.g., product and company names), should be employed. 23 c. Absent a showing of good cause, search terms returning more than 250 24 megabytes of data are presumed to be overbroad. 25 d. The producing party shall search both non-custodial data sources and ESI 26 maintained by the custodians identified pursuant to section B(1). AGREEMENT RE: DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER -- 4 No. 2:13-cv-01092-RSL m43957-2027625_2.doc GRAHAM & DUNN PC Pier 70, 2801 Alaskan Way ~ Suite 300 Seattle, Washington 98121-1128 (206) 624-8300/Fax: (206) 340-9599 1 3. Format. The parties agree that ESI will be produced to the requesting party with 2 searchable text, in a format to be decided between the parties. Acceptable formats include, but are 3 not limited to, native, TIFF (with a companion text file), and searchable PDF. Unless otherwise 4 agreed to by the parties, files that are not easily converted to image format, such as spreadsheet, 5 database and drawing files, should be produced in native format. 6 4. De-duplication. The parties may de-duplicate their ESI production across custodial 7 and non-custodial data sources after disclosure to the requesting party. 8 5. Metadata fields. If the requesting party seeks metadata, the parties agree that only 9 the following metadata fields need be produced: document type; custodian and duplicate custodians; 10 author/from; recipient/to, cc and bcc; title/subject; file name and size; original file path; date and 11 time created, sent, modified and/or received; and hash value. 12 13 DATED: September 6, 2013. PLAINTIFF RONALD F. STRICH DEFENDANT ACCELITEC, INC. 14 By: s/Daniel J. Oates 15 Daniel J. Oates, WSBA #39334 Aimee K. Decker, WSBA #41797 16 GRAHAM & DUNN PC 17 Pier 70, 2801 Alaskan Way Ste 300 Seattle, WA 98121-1128 18 Tel: (206) 340-9631 (Oates) Tel: (206) 340-9625 (Decker) 19 Fax: (206) 340-9599 20 Email: doates@grahamdunn.com Email: adecker@grahamdunn.com 21 Attorneys for Plaintiff By: s/Kenneth L. Karlberg Kenneth L. Karlberg, WSBA #18781 KARLBERG & ASSOCIATES, PLLC 909 Squalicum Way Ste 110 Bellingham, WA 98225 Tel: (360) 325-7774 Email: ken@karlberglaw.com Attorney for Defendant 22 23 24 25 26 AGREEMENT RE: DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER -- 5 No. 2:13-cv-01092-RSL m43957-2027625_2.doc GRAHAM & DUNN PC Pier 70, 2801 Alaskan Way ~ Suite 300 Seattle, Washington 98121-1128 (206) 624-8300/Fax: (206) 340-9599 1 2 ORDER Based on the foregoing, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 DATE: September 10, 2013 4 A Lasnik The Honorable Robert S. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 AGREEMENT RE: DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER -- 6 No. 2:13-cv-01092-RSL m43957-2027625_2.doc GRAHAM & DUNN PC Pier 70, 2801 Alaskan Way ~ Suite 300 Seattle, Washington 98121-1128 (206) 624-8300/Fax: (206) 340-9599

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?