Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp. et al

Filing 338

MDL CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER to the transferor Courts. Signed by Jeffrey N. Luthi for the MDL panel on 7/8/13. (ysS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2013) [Transferred from cand on 7/10/2013.]

Download PDF
Case MDL No. 1827 Document 280 Filed 07/08/13 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: TFT−LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION MDL No. 1827 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER The transferee court in this litigation has advised the Panel that coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings in the action(s) on this conditional remand order have been completed and that remand to the transferor court(s), as provided in 28 U.S.C. §1407(a), is appropriate. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action(s) on this conditional remand order be remanded to its/their respective transferor court(s). IT IS ALSO ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 10.2 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the transmittal of this order to the transferee clerk for filing shall be stayed 7 days from the date of this order. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the office of the Clerk for the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 10.4(a), the parties shall furnish the Clerk for the Northern District of California with a stipulation or designation of the contents of the record to be remanded. FOR THE PANEL: Jul 08, 2013 Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel Case MDL No. 1827 Document 280 Filed 07/08/13 Page 2 of 2 IN RE: TFT−LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION MDL No. 1827 SCHEDULE FOR CRO TRANSFEREE DIST DIV. C.A.NO. TRANSFEROR DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CAN 3 09−05840 ILN 1 09−06610 CAN 3 10−00117 NYE 2 09−04845 CAN 3 11−00058 WAW 2 10−01939 * − denotes that the civil action has been severed. CASE CAPTION Motorola, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al Electrograph Systems, Inc. et al v. Epson Imaging Devices Corporation et al Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp. et al

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?