Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp. et al
Filing
338
MDL CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER to the transferor Courts. Signed by Jeffrey N. Luthi for the MDL panel on 7/8/13. (ysS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2013) [Transferred from cand on 7/10/2013.]
Case MDL No. 1827 Document 280 Filed 07/08/13 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: TFT−LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION
MDL No. 1827
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER
The transferee court in this litigation has advised the Panel that coordinated or consolidated pretrial
proceedings in the action(s) on this conditional remand order have been completed and that remand
to the transferor court(s), as provided in 28 U.S.C. §1407(a), is appropriate.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action(s) on this conditional remand order be remanded to
its/their respective transferor court(s).
IT IS ALSO ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 10.2 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the transmittal of this order to the transferee clerk for
filing shall be stayed 7 days from the date of this order. If any party files a notice of opposition with
the Clerk of the Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the
Panel. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the office of the Clerk for the United
States District Court for the Northern District of California.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 10.4(a), the parties shall furnish the Clerk for
the Northern District of California with a stipulation or designation of the contents of the record to
be remanded.
FOR THE PANEL:
Jul 08, 2013
Jeffery N. Lüthi
Clerk of the Panel
Case MDL No. 1827 Document 280 Filed 07/08/13 Page 2 of 2
IN RE: TFT−LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION
MDL No. 1827
SCHEDULE FOR CRO
TRANSFEREE
DIST DIV. C.A.NO.
TRANSFEROR
DIST DIV. C.A.NO.
CAN
3
09−05840
ILN
1
09−06610
CAN
3
10−00117
NYE
2
09−04845
CAN
3
11−00058
WAW
2
10−01939
* − denotes that the civil action has been severed.
CASE CAPTION
Motorola, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et
al
Electrograph Systems, Inc. et al v. Epson
Imaging Devices Corporation et al
Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp.
et al
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?