Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp. et al

Filing 690

ORDER Granting the Parties' 688 Stipulation regarding Attorney fees by Judge Richard A Jones. (LMK)

HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

7
8

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION,

9
10
11

Plaintiff,
CASE NO. C13-1207RAJ
v.
ORDER
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,

12

Defendants.

13
14

The court GRANTS the parties’ stipulation regarding attorney fees. Dkt. # 688.

15

Unless the court orders otherwise, Costco’s motion for attorney fees and costs (or a

16

stipulation resolving any disputes as to attorney fees and costs) shall be due no later than

17

14 days following the court’s order on Defendants’ post-judgment motion.

18

The court reminds the parties of its previous ruling that any dispute over attorney

19

fees and costs will be resolved (or at least addressed in the first instance) by a special

20

master. If the parties are unable to resolve these disputes, they should attempt to agree on

21

either a special master or a list of potential special masters to resolve them.

22

DATED this 7th day of July, 2015.

24

A

25

The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Court Judge

23

26
27
28

ORDER – 1