Kaiser v. Crossmark, Inc

Filing 20

ORDER CONSOLIDATING WITH CASE NUMBER 13-cv-1335RAJ by Judge Richard A Jones. (CL)

Download PDF
HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 STEVEN NICK, 9 10 11 Plaintiff, MASTER CASE NO. C13-1335RAJ v. CROSSMARK, INC., 12 CONSOLIDATED ORDER Defendant. 13 14 The court discharges its August 30, 2013 order to show cause (Dkt. # 16), noting 15 that all parties are now represented by counsel who are authorized to appear in this 16 District. 17 This case is closely related to Kaiser v. Crossmark, Inc., No. C13-1336RAJ. 18 Although the cases arise from the claims of different plaintiffs, they are against the same 19 employer for the same labor law violations. Indeed, both plaintiffs were members of the 20 same putative class while this case was a potential class action pending in the United 21 States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The same counsel 22 represents both plaintiffs. 23 The court accordingly orders the clerk to CONSOLIDATE the two actions. The 24 above-captioned action shall be the lead case, with No. 13-1336RAJ as the member case. 25 All future filings in the consolidated action shall be in the lead case only, without 26 27 28 ORDER – 1 1 exception. The parties shall use substantially the same caption as this order for all future 2 filings. 3 This case is now ready for initial scheduling. The court directs the clerk to issue 4 an order establishing initial pretrial deadlines and a date for submission of a joint status 5 report. The parties may use that report to raise any objection to the continued 6 consolidation of these cases. 7 DATED this 7th day of October, 2013. 8 A 9 10 The Honorable Richard A. Jones United States District Court Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER – 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?