Rahim v. Providence Health & Services
Filing
30
ORDER AND CERTIFICATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON by Judge Richard A Jones. (CL)(cc: Atty Gen; this order and docket no. 27 )
HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
AZRA RAHIM,
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
v.
PROVIDENCE HEALTH AND
SERVICES,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER AND CERTIFICATION OF
CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE
TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF THE STATE OF
WASHINGTON
Defendant.
The court has received the parties’ joint statement regarding Plaintiff’s intent to
challenge the constitutionality of Washington’s exemption of not-for-profit religious
organizations from the employment discrimination provisions of the Washington Law
Against Discrimination. RCW 49.60.040(11) (“‘Employer’ . . . does not include any
religious or sectarian organization not organized for private profit.”). The parties have
stipulated that Defendant is a not-for-profit religious organization within the meaning of
the statutory exemption.
The parties intend to submit summary judgment motions asking the court to rule
that the statutory exemption violates the United States Constitution. The parties have
shown no need for each of them to file a separate motion. A single motion will suffice.
In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.1(b) and 28 U.S.C.
§ 2403(b), the court certifies to the Attorney General of the State of Washington that the
constitutionality of a Washington statute affecting the public interest has been drawn into
27
28
CASE NO. C13-1499RAJ
ORDER – 1
1
question in this case. The State of Washington may intervene in this action to present
2
evidence or argument on the constitutional question.
3
The court orders as follows:
4
1) The clerk shall send this order and the court’s May 1, 2014 order to the
5
Attorney General:
6
Bob Ferguson, Attorney General of the State of Washington
1125 Washington Street SE
P.O. Box 40100
Olympia, WA 98504-0100
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2) No later than June 19, 2014, Plaintiff shall submit a motion for summary
judgment addressed solely to her challenge to the constitutionality of the
statutory exemption at issue. Plaintiff shall note the motion for July 25, 2014.
If Plaintiff does not file her motion by June 19, the court will deem her
constitutional challenge waived and will dismiss as untimely her claims arising
under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
3) No later than July 15, 2014, Defendant shall file an opposition to the summary
judgment motion. Plaintiff may file a reply brief no later than July 24.
4) The parties shall serve, by mail (or by another means if the Attorney General
requests it) a copy of each of their briefs on the Attorney General at the address
above. Service shall include the brief and this order, with this paragraph
highlighted. The parties shall certify compliance with this paragraph in the
certificate of service accompanying their filings. Compliance with this order
will constitute compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.1(a).
DATED this 19th day of May, 2014.
A
24
25
The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Court Judge
26
27
28
ORDER – 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?