Puget Soundkeeper Alliance v. Whitley Manufacturing Co., Inc.

Filing 89

ORDER denying Whitley Manufacturing's 66 Motion for Summary Judgment by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(RS)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

6
7
8

PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE,

9

Plaintiff,

10

CASE NO. C13-1690RSL

v.
ORDER DENYING WHITLEY
MANUFACTURING’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

11
12

WHITLEY MANUFACTURING CO.,
INC., et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

This matter comes before the Court on “Whitley Manufacturing Co., Inc.’s
Motion for Summary Judgment.” Dkt. # 66. Plaintiff has shown that there is outstanding
discovery that may shed light on whether defendant has and exercises control over
Whitley Evergreen, Inc., such that Whitley Manufacturing could be held liable in this
action. The Court therefore DENIES the motion for summary judgment under Fed. R.
Civ. P. 56(d) without prejudice to the issues being raised again after discovery has been
completed.

22
23

Dated this 9th day of November, 2015.

A

24

Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge

25
26
ORDER DENYING MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT