Turner et al v. Fraser's Boiler Service Inc et al

Filing 198

MINUTE ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge; The 89 motion for summary judgment brought by defendant Lone Star is GRANTED in part, DENIED in part, and DEFERRED in part. Lone Star's motions in limine, docket nos. 125 & 139 -1, are DEFERRED in part and STRICKEN in part as moot. See Minute Order for details (TF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 JAMES B. TURNER, et al., 8 9 10 11 Plaintiffs, LOCKHEED SHIPBUILDING COMPANY, et al., MINUTE ORDER Defendants. 12 13 C13-1747 TSZ v. The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: 14 (1) The motion for summary judgment brought by defendant Lone Star Industries, Inc., successor-in-interest to Pioneer Sand & Gravel Company (“Lone Star”), 15 docket no. 89, is GRANTED in part, DENIED in part, and DEFERRED in part as follows: 16 (a) With regard to plaintiffs’ claims for conspiracy, spoliation, willful or 17 wanton misconduct, breach of warranty, and market-share liability, Lone Star’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and such claims are DISMISSED 18 with prejudice. 19 20 21 22 (b) With regard to plaintiffs’ claims relating to direct exposure to an asbestos-containing product from Lone Star, the motion is DENIED. Genuine disputes of material fact exist and preclude summary judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). (c) With regard to plaintiffs’ claims relating to indirect exposure to an asbestos-containing product from Lone Star, the motion is DEFERRED. 23 MINUTE ORDER - 1 1 (2) Lone Star’s motions in limine, docket nos. 125 & 139-1, are DEFERRED in part and STRICKEN in part as moot, as follows: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (a) Lone Star’s motions relating to (2) the testimony of Carl A. Brodkin, M.D.; (3) the testimony of William Longo, Ph.D.; (4) the testimony of Susan Raterman; (5) the testimony of William O. Brandt; (6) the testimony of plaintiff’s co-workers concerning Insulag; and (7) governmental and nongovernmental reports, policies, commentaries, etc. are DEFERRED; (b) Lone Star’s motions relating to (1) cumulative asbestos exposure; (8) appeals to passion or prejudice; and (9) references to Lone Star as a member of the “asbestos industry” are STRICKEN as moot in light of the Court’s rulings concerning the motions in limine brought by Lockheed Shipbuilding Company and ON Marine Services Company, LLC, Ferro Engineering Division (“ON Marine”). Such rulings apply with respect to all parties, except as otherwise stated. Plaintiffs may refer to Lone Star and ON Marine in a similar manner, with the same restrictions as stated in the Minute Order addressing ON Marine’s motions in limine. 10 (3) Counsel shall be prepared to address the deferred portion of the motion for summary judgment and the deferred motions in limine identified in Paragraph 2(a) at the 11 Pretrial Conference scheduled for November 26, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. 12 13 (4) record. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of Dated this 22nd day of November, 2013. 14 William M. McCool Clerk 15 16 s/Claudia Hawney Deputy Clerk 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 MINUTE ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?